SCHEMBL14769653

SCHEMBL14769653

CO/N=C/C(C)(C)NC(=O)C(Oc1ccc2ncc(C)cc2c1)SC

nearest known ligand 0.36

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MET P08581 6/20 0.36
HPGD P15428 5/20 0.35
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.35
F2 P00734 1/20 0.35
GLA P06280 1/20 0.35
KDR P35968 3/20 0.34
AURKA O14965 1/20 0.34
ABL1 P00519 1/20 0.34
LCK P06239 1/20 0.34
FYN P06241 1/20 0.34
YES1 P07947 1/20 0.34
FGFR2 P21802 1/20 0.34
EPHA2 P29317 1/20 0.34
LTK P29376 1/20 0.34
AXL P30530 1/20 0.34
FLT3 P36888 1/20 0.34
MST1R Q04912 1/20 0.34
PTK6 Q13882 1/20 0.34
KDM4E B2RXH2 5/20 0.33
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL14859826 1.00 MET (0.36) METHPGDALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL12181871 0.91 HPGD (0.42) METHPGDALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL14763523 0.91 HPGD (0.42) METHPGDALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL14763267 0.91 ALDH1A1 (0.35) METHPGDALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL12181858 0.91 ALDH1A1 (0.35) METHPGDALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL535447 0.90 ALDH1A1 (0.34) METHPGDALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL535446 0.90 ALDH1A1 (0.34) METHPGDALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL534691 0.90 ALDH1A1 (0.34) METHPGDALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL534690 0.90 ALDH1A1 (0.34) METHPGDALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL14860036 0.88 MET (0.39) METHPGDALDH1A1F2GLA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20130096156-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS FUNGICIDES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) 2013-04-18 US disclosed
US-20130096156-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS FUNGICIDES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) 2013-04-18 US disclosed
US-20130096156-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS FUNGICIDES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) 2013-04-18 US disclosed
US-20130065922-A1 NOVEL AMIDES AS FUNGICIDES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) 2013-03-14 US disclosed
EP-2397467-A1 Quinoline derivatives as fungicides Syngenta Participations AG (CH) 2011-12-21 EP disclosed
WO-2011154240-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS FUNGICIDES SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2011-12-15 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130096156-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS FUNGICIDES CYP1A1, CYP4X1, CYP3A7 MET 4288/4885HPGD 3828/4885ALDH1A1 350/4885
US-20130065922-A1 NOVEL AMIDES AS FUNGICIDES CYP51A1, DDT, CYP4X1 MET 2605/4885HPGD 4473/4885ALDH1A1 264/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.