SCHEMBL15920844

SCHEMBL15920844

COc1cc2c(O)c3c(c(C=Cc4ccccc4)c2cc1OC)C(=O)OC3

nearest known ligand 0.56

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPT P10636 5/20 0.56
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 4/20 0.56
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.56
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.56
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.56
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.56
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.56
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.56
HTT P42858 1/20 0.56
TUBB1 Q9H4B7 3/20 0.41
CYP1A1 P04798 1/20 0.41
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.41
CYP1B1 Q16678 1/20 0.41
TUBB4A P04350 2/20 0.41
TUBB P07437 2/20 0.41
TUBA3C P0DPH7 2/20 0.41
TUBA1B P68363 2/20 0.41
TUBA4A P68366 2/20 0.41
TUBB4B P68371 2/20 0.41
TUBB3 Q13509 2/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL15920842 1.00 MAPT (0.56) MAPTNPSR1KMT2AKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL15920893 0.87 KDM4E (0.46) MAPTNPSR1KMT2AKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL15920891 0.87 KDM4E (0.46) MAPTNPSR1KMT2AKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL17280384 0.87 ALOX5 (0.42) MAPTNPSR1KMT2AKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL15920749 0.82 ALDH1A1 (0.71) MAPTNPSR1KMT2AKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL15932525 0.81 KDM4E (0.65) MAPTNPSR1KMT2AKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL15920734 0.80 MAPT (0.47) MAPTNPSR1KMT2AKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL15920731 0.80 MAPT (0.47) MAPTNPSR1KMT2AKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL17280382 0.78 TUBB4A (0.39) MAPTNPSR1KDM4EALDH1A1LMNA
SCHEMBL18872117 0.76 KDM4E (0.60) MAPTNPSR1KMT2AKDM4EALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9650355-B2 Method for preparation of justicidin a derivatives of arylnaphthalene lignan structure KOREA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (KR) 2017-05-16 US claimed
WO-2014119892-A1 METHOD FOR PREPARATION OF JUSTICIDIN A DERIVATIVES OF ARYLNAPHTHALENE LIGNAN STRUCTURE KOREA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (KR) 2014-08-07 WO claimed
US-9650355-B2 Method for preparation of justicidin a derivatives of arylnaphthalene lignan structure KOREA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (KR) 2017-05-16 US disclosed
US-20150336938-A1 METHOD FOR PREPARATION OF JUSTICIDIN A DERIVATIVES OF ARYLNAPHTHALENE LIGNAN STRUCTURE KOREA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (KR) 2015-11-26 US disclosed
WO-2014119892-A1 METHOD FOR PREPARATION OF JUSTICIDIN A DERIVATIVES OF ARYLNAPHTHALENE LIGNAN STRUCTURE KOREA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (KR) 2014-08-07 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20150336938-A1 METHOD FOR PREPARATION OF JUSTICIDIN A DERIVATIVES OF ARYLNAPHTHALENE LIGNAN STRUCTURE UGT1A8, NOTUM, MLN MAPT 3028/4885NPSR1 3558/4885KMT2A 1345/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.