SCHEMBL1644702

SCHEMBL1644702

O=C(Nc1ccc(N2CCN(c3ccc(CN4CCOCC4)cn3)CC2)cc1)C(=O)c1c(-c2ccccc2)cc2ccccn12

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPT P10636 7/20 0.52
ALDH1A1 P00352 5/20 0.52
LMNA P02545 4/20 0.52
HTT P42858 4/20 0.52
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.47
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.47
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 5/20 0.44
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.44
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.44
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.44
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.44
THRB P10828 1/20 0.43
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.43
WNT3A P56704 1/20 0.41
HIF1A Q16665 2/20 0.40
EPAS1 Q99814 2/20 0.40
POLB P06746 1/20 0.39
GAA P10253 1/20 0.39
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.39
DGAT1 O75907 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1646841 0.91 ALDH1A1 (0.58) MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHTTKMT2A
SCHEMBL1126649 0.86 ALDH1A1 (0.43) MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHTTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL943643 0.84 WNT3A (0.40) MAPTLMNAHTTKMT2ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1646239 0.84 ALDH1A1 (0.53) MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHTTKMT2A
SCHEMBL1646414 0.84 MAPT (0.66) MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHTTKMT2A
SCHEMBL13438886 0.82 ALDH1A1 (0.52) MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHTTKMT2A
SCHEMBL1989903 0.81 DGAT1 (0.40) MAPTALDH1A1LMNAKMT2ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1646297 0.81 ALDH1A1 (0.55) MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHTTKMT2A
SCHEMBL1645361 0.81 LMNA (0.61) MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHTTKMT2A
SCHEMBL13438885 0.80 MAPT (0.46) MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHTTKMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 17 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2097413-B1 2-[(2-SUBSTITUTED)-IND0LIZIN-3-YL]-2-OXO-ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVES AS ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS F2G LTD (GB) 2013-12-25 EP claimed
US-8604029-B2 2-[(2-substituted)-indolizin-3-yl]-2-oxo-acetamide derivatives as antifungal agents F2G LTD BRITISH BODY CORPORATE (GB) 2013-12-10 US claimed
US-20110183969-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMBINATION THERAPY F2G LTD (GB) 2011-07-28 US claimed
EP-2303329-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMBINATION THERAPY F2G Limited (GB) 2011-04-06 EP claimed
US-20100056511-A1 2- [ (2-SUBSTITUTED) -IND0LIZIN-3-YL] -2-OXO-ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVES AS ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS F2G LTD. 2010-03-04 US claimed
WO-2009144473-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMBINATION THERAPY F2G LIMITED (GB) 2009-12-03 WO claimed
EP-2097413-B1 2-[(2-SUBSTITUTED)-IND0LIZIN-3-YL]-2-OXO-ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVES AS ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS F2G LTD (GB) 2013-12-25 EP disclosed
US-8604029-B2 2-[(2-substituted)-indolizin-3-yl]-2-oxo-acetamide derivatives as antifungal agents F2G LTD BRITISH BODY CORPORATE (GB) 2013-12-10 US disclosed
US-20110183969-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMBINATION THERAPY F2G LTD (GB) 2011-07-28 US disclosed
EP-2303329-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMBINATION THERAPY F2G Limited (GB) 2011-04-06 EP disclosed
US-20100056511-A1 2- [ (2-SUBSTITUTED) -IND0LIZIN-3-YL] -2-OXO-ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVES AS ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS F2G LTD. 2010-03-04 US disclosed
US-20100056511-A1 2- [ (2-SUBSTITUTED) -IND0LIZIN-3-YL] -2-OXO-ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVES AS ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS F2G LTD. 2010-03-04 US disclosed
US-20100056511-A1 2- [ (2-SUBSTITUTED) -IND0LIZIN-3-YL] -2-OXO-ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVES AS ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS F2G LTD. 2010-03-04 US disclosed
WO-2009144473-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMBINATION THERAPY F2G LIMITED (GB) 2009-12-03 WO disclosed
EP-2097413-A1 2-[(2-SUBSTITUTED)-IND0LIZIN-3-YL]-2-OXO-ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVES AS ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS F2G Limited (GB) 2009-09-09 EP disclosed
WO-2008062182-A1 2- [ (2-SUBSTITUTED) -IND0LIZIN-3-YL] -2-OXO-ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVES AS ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS F2G LTD (GB) 2008-05-29 WO disclosed
WO-2008062182-A1 2- [ (2-SUBSTITUTED) -IND0LIZIN-3-YL] -2-OXO-ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVES AS ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS F2G LTD (GB) 2008-05-29 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110183969-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMBINATION THERAPY IDO1, FOXM1, IPO5 MAPT 1771/4885ALDH1A1 2813/4885LMNA 3870/4885
US-20100056511-A1 2- [ (2-SUBSTITUTED) -IND0LIZIN-3-YL] -2-OXO-ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVES AS ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS NAT1, AGXT, CYP1A2 MAPT 2950/4885ALDH1A1 318/4885LMNA 1805/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.