SCHEMBL1774590

SCHEMBL1774590

Cc1ccc(F)cc1C(=O)c1ccc(C(C)(C)C)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GAA P10253 1/20 0.52
SRD5A2 P31213 1/20 0.49
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.48
SIRT1 Q96EB6 1/20 0.47
MAPT P10636 5/20 0.44
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.44
NPC1 O15118 3/20 0.44
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.44
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.44
XBP1 P17861 1/20 0.44
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.44
HTT P42858 1/20 0.44
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.44
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.44
THRB P10828 1/20 0.44
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.44
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.44
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.42
PKM P14618 1/20 0.42
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1772371 0.88 SRD5A2 (0.49) SRD5A2NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL1773658 0.81 MAPT (0.47) SRD5A2SIRT1MAPTSMN1; SMN2RAB9A
SCHEMBL11101475 0.80 PTGS2 (0.51) GAATDP1MAPTNPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL1772091 0.80 GAA (0.48) GAASRD5A2TDP1SIRT1MAPT
SCHEMBL18997444 0.79 SRD5A2 (0.68) GAASRD5A2SIRT1MAPTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL14415777 0.79 CES2 (0.50) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1RAB9AMEN1
SCHEMBL1773115 0.78 KMT2A (0.50) GAATDP1MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1
SCHEMBL1773507 0.78 CDC25B (0.51) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1RAB9AMEN1
SCHEMBL28672497 0.78 TDP1 (0.58) SRD5A2TDP1MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1
SCHEMBL1773101 0.77 MAPK14 (0.48) GAATDP1SMN1; SMN2NPC1RAB9A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110112097-A1 Substituted imidazoline-2,4-diones, process for preparation thereof, medicaments comprising these compounds and use thereof SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2011-05-12 US disclosed
EP-2242747-A1 SUBSTITUTED IMIDAZOLIDINE-2,4-DIONES, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF, MEDICAMENTS CONTAINING SAID COMPOUNDS AND USE THEREOF Sanofi-Aventis (FR) 2010-10-27 EP disclosed
WO-2009097997-A1 SUBSTITUTED IMIDAZOLIDINE-2,4-DIONES, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF, MEDICAMENTS CONTAINING SAID COMPOUNDS AND USE THEREOF SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2009-08-13 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110112097-A1 Substituted imidazoline-2,4-diones, process for preparation thereof, medicaments comprising these compounds and use thereof GIPR, PGC, DDC GAA 231/4885SRD5A2 166/4885TDP1 3037/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.