SCHEMBL1775937

SCHEMBL1775937

Cc1ccc(NS(=O)(=O)c2c(Br)sc3ccnc(Cl)c23)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CDK1 P06493 1/20 0.42
CCNB1 P14635 1/20 0.42
CCNA2 P20248 1/20 0.42
CCND1 P24385 1/20 0.42
CDK2 P24941 1/20 0.42
CDK7 P50613 1/20 0.42
CCNH P51946 1/20 0.42
CCNA1 P78396 1/20 0.42
CDK6 Q00534 1/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 7/20 0.40
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.40
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.40
PGR P06401 1/20 0.38
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.36
PKM P14618 2/20 0.36
HTT P42858 2/20 0.36
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.36
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.36
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.36
GLA P06280 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1775987 0.79 HTT (0.39) ALDH1A1LMNAPKMHTTSMN1; SMN2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL1774418 0.78 HTT (0.39) ALDH1A1LMNAPKMHTTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1774164 0.76
SCHEMBL28752857 0.76 HIPK2 (0.32)
SCHEMBL1775044 0.73 NPSR1 (0.50) CDK1CCNB1CCNA2CCND1CDK2
SCHEMBL1775869 0.68 LMNA (0.39) LMNAPKMSMN1; SMN2KDM4ECYP3A4
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL1776644 0.68 LMNA (0.39) LMNAPKMSMN1; SMN2KDM4ECYP3A4
SCHEMBL29053323 0.64 ATM (0.67) CDK1CCNB1CCNA2CCND1CDK2
SCHEMBL31226989 0.64 NOTUM (0.30)
Lithium Ion SCHEMBL1775997 0.63

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7943639-B2 Such as 6-benzenesulfonyl-4-piperazin-1-yl-quinoline hydrochloride; for treatment of central nervous system and/or 5- HT6 receptor related disorders; for weight gain/loss PROXIMAGEN LIMITED (GB) 2011-05-17 US disclosed
EP-1897881-A2 Compounds useful for the treatment of obesity, type II diabetes and CNS disorders Biovitrum AB (publ) (SE) 2008-03-12 EP disclosed
EP-1513828-A1 NEW COMPOUNDS USEFUL FOR THE TREATMENT OF OBESITY, TYPE II DIABETES AND CNS DISORDERS Biovitrum AB (SE) 2005-03-16 EP disclosed
US-20040024210-A1 New compounds PROXIMAGEN NEUROSCIENCE PLC (GB) 2004-02-05 US disclosed
WO-2004000828-A1 NEW COMPOUNDS USEFUL FOR THE TREATMENT OF OBESITY, TYPE II DIABETES AND CNS DISORDERS BIOVITRUM AB (SE) 2003-12-31 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040024210-A1 New compounds SULT1E1, SULT2A1, SULT1A1 CDK1 3339/4885CCNB1 781/4885CCNA2 1323/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.