SCHEMBL18239361

SCHEMBL18239361

CC(C)C[C@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCCCN=[N+]=[N-])[C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(=O)O)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(=N)N)C(=O)N[C@@H](Cc1cnc[nH]1)C(=O)NCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCC(=O)NCCNC(=O)CCCC[C@@H]1SC[C@@H]2NC(=O)N[C@@H]21)C(C)C

nearest known ligand 0.54

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ AKT1 P31749 1/20 0.54
▸ GLP1R P43220 4/20 0.52
▸ GCGR P47871 1/20 0.52
▸ CCKBR P32239 1/20 0.52
▸ RAMP3 O60896 7/20 0.52
▸ CALCR P30988 7/20 0.52
▸ ECE1 P42892 1/20 0.51
▸ MUS81 Q96NY9 1/20 0.51
▸ CXCR4 P61073 4/20 0.49
▸ GHSR Q92847 2/20 0.49
▸ NPY2R P49146 1/20 0.49
▸ PTH1R Q03431 1/20 0.49
▸ VIPR1 P32241 1/20 0.49
▸ VIPR2 P41587 1/20 0.49

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL21168599 0.80 GLP1R (0.52) AKT1GLP1RGCGR
SCHEMBL22550645 0.77 PLG (0.57) GLP1R
SCHEMBL17209334 0.75 PLCG1 (0.44) AKT1RAMP3CALCR
SCHEMBL17209387 0.75 PLCG1 (0.44) AKT1RAMP3CALCR
SCHEMBL22423719 0.75 RAMP3 (0.56) GLP1RGCGRRAMP3CALCR
SCHEMBL24220346 0.74 FOLH1 (0.54) CXCR4
SCHEMBL29349772 0.74 NR3C1 (0.68) GLP1RCCKBRECE1MUS81PTH1R
SCHEMBL31332127 0.73 AKT1 (0.54) AKT1
SCHEMBL22550672 0.73 GLP1R (0.54) GLP1RGCGRCCKBRRAMP3CALCR
SCHEMBL22802863 0.73 PLG (0.54) GLP1R

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20160331800-A1 BOTULINUM NEUROTOXIN-SPECIFIC CAPTURE AGENTS, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS OF USING AND MAKING REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 2016-11-17 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160331800-A1 BOTULINUM NEUROTOXIN-SPECIFIC CAPTURE AGENTS, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS OF USING AND MAKING BTD, NPY1R, BTN3A1 AKT1 4575/4885GLP1R 220/4885GCGR 786/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback