SCHEMBL1885083

SCHEMBL1885083

CC(C)(C)[Si](C)(C)Oc1ccc(C(Br)Br)c(C(Br)Br)c1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CA12 O43570 4/20 0.46
CA1 P00915 4/20 0.46
CA9 Q16790 4/20 0.46
PREP P48147 4/20 0.38
APLNR P35414 2/20 0.33
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.31
HSP90AB1 P08238 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5509632 0.80 CA12 (0.43) CA12CA1CA9PREPHSP90AA1
SCHEMBL25370505 0.78 CA12 (0.41) CA12CA1CA9PREP
SCHEMBL5736709 0.76 CA12 (0.44) CA12CA1CA9PREPAPLNR
SCHEMBL6763899 0.76 PREP (0.53) CA12CA1CA9PREPHSP90AA1
SCHEMBL4651487 0.75 CA12 (0.43) CA12CA1CA9PREPAPLNR
SCHEMBL24456188 0.75 CA12 (0.43) CA12CA1CA9PREPAPLNR
SCHEMBL3805134 0.74 CA12 (0.40) CA12CA1CA9PREP
SCHEMBL596046 0.73 CA12 (0.42) CA12CA1CA9PREPAPLNR
SCHEMBL17672515 0.73 CA12 (0.42) CA12CA1CA9PREPAPLNR
SCHEMBL7706827 0.72 CA1 (0.50) CA12CA1CA9PREPHSP90AA1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7935836-B2 Compounds comprising a linear series of five fused carbon rings, and preparation thereof FALLIS ALEXANDER GRAHAM 2011-05-03 US disclosed
US-20100004467-A1 COMPOUNDS COMPRISING A LINEAR SERIES OF FIVE FUSED CARBON RINGS, AND PREPARATION THEREOF FALLIS ALEXANDER GRAHAM 2010-01-07 US disclosed
US-20060267004-A1 Compounds comprising a linear series of five fused carbon rings, and preparation thereof UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA (CA) 2006-11-30 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100004467-A1 COMPOUNDS COMPRISING A LINEAR SERIES OF FIVE FUSED CARBON RINGS, AND PREPARATION THEREOF JUP, CDH1, EML4 CA12 926/4885CA1 1324/4885CA9 1102/4885
US-20060267004-A1 Compounds comprising a linear series of five fused carbon rings, and preparation thereof JUP, LATS2, CDH1 CA12 1813/4885CA1 1374/4885CA9 1028/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.