SCHEMBL2015377

SCHEMBL2015377

NC(=O)c1ccc(-c2ccc(C=O)s2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.56

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PRF1 P14222 5/20 0.56
APP P05067 1/20 0.49
CYP2E1 P05181 1/20 0.46
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.46
CYP2A6 P11509 1/20 0.46
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.46
CYP2B6 P20813 1/20 0.46
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.46
ERN1 O75460 1/20 0.45
MKNK1 Q9BUB5 1/20 0.45
MKNK2 Q9HBH9 1/20 0.45
IKBKB O14920 1/20 0.44
NQO2 P16083 2/20 0.43
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.42
DPP4 P27487 1/20 0.41
PARP10 Q53GL7 1/20 0.41
PARP3 Q9Y6F1 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2015912 0.84 APP (0.54) PRF1APPCYP2E1CYP3A4CYP2A6
SCHEMBL2015237 0.84 PRF1 (0.59) PRF1APPCYP2E1CYP3A4CYP2A6
SCHEMBL2016057 0.83 PRF1 (0.56) PRF1APPCYP2E1CYP3A4CYP2A6
SCHEMBL2018299 0.80 PRF1 (0.60) PRF1APPCYP2E1CYP3A4CYP2A6
SCHEMBL608586 0.79 PRF1 (0.60) PRF1APPCYP2E1CYP3A4CYP2A6
SCHEMBL2019176 0.79 PRF1 (0.58) PRF1APPCYP2E1CYP3A4CYP2A6
SCHEMBL2018262 0.78 APP (0.61) PRF1APPCYP2E1CYP3A4CYP2A6
SCHEMBL28831708 0.78 APP (0.59) PRF1APPCYP2E1CYP3A4CYP2A6
SCHEMBL25339850 0.76 APP (0.69) PRF1APPCYP2E1CYP3A4CYP2A6
SCHEMBL28831656 0.76 APP (0.64) PRF1APPCYP2E1CYP3A4CYP2A6

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20220340893-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL COMPLEXES AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SUCH COMPLEXES NUEVOLUTION A/S (DK) 2022-10-27 US disclosed
US-11225655-B2 Bi-functional complexes and methods for making and using such complexes NUEVOLUTION A/S (DK) 2022-01-18 US disclosed
EP-3540059-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL COMPLEXES AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SUCH COMPLEXES Nuevolution A/S (DK) 2019-09-18 EP disclosed
EP-2558577-B1 BI-FUNCTIONAL COMPLEXES AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SUCH COMPLEXES NUEVOLUTION AS (DK) 2018-12-12 EP disclosed
US-20130281324-A1 BI-FUNCTINAL COMPLEXES AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SUCH COMPLEXES NUEVOLUTION A/S (DK) 2013-10-24 US disclosed
US-20130065897-A1 COMPOUNDS, PREPARATION AND USES THEREOF PETER MACCALLUM CANCER INSTITUTE (AU) 2013-03-14 US disclosed
EP-2558577-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL COMPLEXES AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SUCH COMPLEXES Nuevolution A/S (DK) 2013-02-20 EP disclosed
EP-2515903-A1 COMPOUNDS, PREPARATIONS AND USES THEREOF Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute (AU) 2012-10-31 EP disclosed
WO-2011127933-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL COMPLEXES AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SUCH COMPLEXES NUEVOLUTION A/S (DK) 2011-10-20 WO disclosed
WO-2011075784-A1 COMPOUNDS, PREPARATIONS AND USES THEREOF PETER MACCALLUM CANCER INSTITUTE (AU) 2011-06-30 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130065897-A1 COMPOUNDS, PREPARATION AND USES THEREOF PRF1, GZMB, SERPINB1 PRF1 1/4885APP 424/4885CYP2E1 2226/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.