SCHEMBL20161294

SCHEMBL20161294

CCOC(=O)C(C)C1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](OC2O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]2O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LGALS3 P17931 3/20 0.46
LGALS8 O00214 2/20 0.46
LGALS4 P56470 2/20 0.46
TYR P14679 6/20 0.43
IGF2R P11717 1/20 0.42
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.41
AMY1A P0DUB6 1/20 0.41
LGALS9 O00182 1/20 0.40
LGALS1 P09382 1/20 0.40
LGALS7; LGALS7B P47929 1/20 0.40
ENGASE Q8NFI3 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20158783 0.88 LGALS3 (0.46) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4TYRIGF2R
SCHEMBL20161298 0.88 LGALS3 (0.46) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4TYRIGF2R
SCHEMBL21342377 0.88 LGALS3 (0.49) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4TYRIGF2R
SCHEMBL20161936 0.88 LGALS3 (0.49) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4TYRIGF2R
SCHEMBL20161450 0.87 PYGB (0.42) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS9LGALS1
SCHEMBL20161570 0.87 PYGB (0.42) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS9LGALS1
SCHEMBL20161440 0.87 PYGB (0.42) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS9LGALS1
SCHEMBL20161568 0.87 LGALS8 (0.51) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4
SCHEMBL20161574 0.86 LGALS3 (0.42) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4TYRIGF2R
SCHEMBL20161463 0.83 LGALS3 (0.46) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4TYRIGF2R

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11045411-B2 Process for treating keratin materials using amide, acid or ester c-glycoside derivatives, and cosmetic composition containing same L'OREAL (FR) 2021-06-29 US disclosed
US-20180133137-A1 PROCESS FOR TREATING KERATIN MATERIALS USING AMIDE, ACID OR ESTER C-GLYCOSIDE DERIVATIVES, AND COSMETIC COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME L'OREAL (FR) 2018-05-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20180133137-A1 PROCESS FOR TREATING KERATIN MATERIALS USING AMIDE, ACID OR ESTER C-GLYCOSIDE DERIVATIVES, AND COSMETIC COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME KRT18, CUTA, GLA LGALS3 403/4885LGALS8 270/4885LGALS4 351/4885
US-11045411-B2 Process for treating keratin materials using amide, acid or ester c-glycoside derivatives, and cosmetic composition containing same KRT18, CUTA, GLA LGALS3 403/4885LGALS8 270/4885LGALS4 351/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.