SCHEMBL20161456

SCHEMBL20161456

CNC(=O)C(O)C1O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PYGB P11216 7/20 0.43
GAA P10253 1/20 0.43
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.40
CA12 O43570 3/20 0.37
CA1 P00915 3/20 0.37
CA2 P00918 3/20 0.37
CA9 Q16790 3/20 0.37
LGALS9 O00182 1/20 0.37
LGALS8 O00214 1/20 0.37
LGALS1 P09382 1/20 0.37
LGALS3 P17931 1/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL18214280 1.00 PYGB (0.43) PYGBGAATSHRCA12CA1
SCHEMBL18214271 1.00 PYGB (0.43) PYGBGAATSHRCA12CA1
SCHEMBL18214300 0.86 LGALS3 (0.46) CA12CA1CA2CA9LGALS9
SCHEMBL20161908 0.84 PYGB (0.43) PYGBGAATSHRCA12CA1
SCHEMBL20161563 0.84 PYGB (0.43) PYGBGAATSHRCA12CA1
SCHEMBL20161561 0.84 PYGB (0.43) PYGBGAATSHRCA12CA1
SCHEMBL20161577 0.82 PYGB (0.43) PYGBGAACA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL20161459 0.82 PYGB (0.43) PYGBGAACA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL18214272 0.82 PYGB (0.43) PYGBGAACA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL20265948 0.81 LGALS1 (0.42) PYGBGAACA12CA1CA2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11045411-B2 Process for treating keratin materials using amide, acid or ester c-glycoside derivatives, and cosmetic composition containing same L'OREAL (FR) 2021-06-29 US disclosed
US-20180133137-A1 PROCESS FOR TREATING KERATIN MATERIALS USING AMIDE, ACID OR ESTER C-GLYCOSIDE DERIVATIVES, AND COSMETIC COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME L'OREAL (FR) 2018-05-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20180133137-A1 PROCESS FOR TREATING KERATIN MATERIALS USING AMIDE, ACID OR ESTER C-GLYCOSIDE DERIVATIVES, AND COSMETIC COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME KRT18, CUTA, GLA PYGB 3409/4885GAA 271/4885TSHR 1633/4885
US-11045411-B2 Process for treating keratin materials using amide, acid or ester c-glycoside derivatives, and cosmetic composition containing same KRT18, CUTA, GLA PYGB 3409/4885GAA 271/4885TSHR 1633/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.