SCHEMBL20957054

SCHEMBL20957054

CC(CNS(=O)(=O)N1CCCCC1)N1CCc2ccccc21

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ MAPT P10636 11/20 0.47
▸ GAA P10253 4/20 0.47
▸ TP53 P04637 3/20 0.47
▸ GFER P55789 2/20 0.46
▸ L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.46
▸ HCRTR1 O43613 1/20 0.42
▸ SLC6A2 P23975 2/20 0.41
▸ SLC6A4 P31645 2/20 0.41
▸ KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.41
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.40
▸ POLB P06746 1/20 0.40
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.40
▸ HTT P42858 1/20 0.40
▸ SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20957019 0.99 MAPT (0.48) MAPTGAATP53GFERL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL31467485 0.99 MAPT (0.48) MAPTGAATP53GFERL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL20988353 0.90 MAPT (0.47) MAPTGAATP53GFERL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL20988440 0.88 GFER (0.47) MAPTGAATP53GFERL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL20956995 0.88 GAA (0.46) MAPTGAATP53GFERL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL31467509 0.82 MAPT (0.51) MAPTGAATP53GFERL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL20957055 0.80 MAPT (0.50) MAPTGAATP53GFERL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL31467503 0.80 MAPT (0.72) MAPTGAATP53GFERL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL26299356 0.79 MAPT (0.46) MAPTGAATP53GFERL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL20956994 0.78 MAPT (0.48) MAPTGAATP53GFERL3MBTL1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10654802-B2 Indoline derivatives and method for using and producing the same ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNVERSIT (US) 2020-05-19 — — US claimed
US-20190135746-A1 INDOLINE DERIVATIVES AND METHOD FOR USING AND PRODUCING THE SAME ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019-05-09 — — US claimed
EP-3481801-B1 INDOLINE DERIVATIVES AND METHOD FOR USING AND PRODUCING THE SAME UNIV ARIZONA (US) 2023-09-06 — — EP disclosed
EP-3481801-B1 INDOLINE DERIVATIVES AND METHOD FOR USING AND PRODUCING THE SAME UNIV ARIZONA (US) 2023-09-06 — — EP disclosed
US-10654802-B2 Indoline derivatives and method for using and producing the same ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNVERSIT (US) 2020-05-19 — — US disclosed
US-10654802-B2 Indoline derivatives and method for using and producing the same ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNVERSIT (US) 2020-05-19 — — US disclosed
US-20190135746-A1 INDOLINE DERIVATIVES AND METHOD FOR USING AND PRODUCING THE SAME ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019-05-09 — — US disclosed
US-20190135746-A1 INDOLINE DERIVATIVES AND METHOD FOR USING AND PRODUCING THE SAME ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019-05-09 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-10654802-B2 Indoline derivatives and method for using and producing the same IDO1, IDO2, MMP1 MAPT 1971/4885GAA 2768/4885TP53 3152/4885
US-20190135746-A1 INDOLINE DERIVATIVES AND METHOD FOR USING AND PRODUCING THE SAME IDO1, INMT, MMP1 MAPT 1638/4885GAA 2208/4885TP53 3821/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback