SCHEMBL210498

SCHEMBL210498

CN(C(=O)NCc1cccc(F)c1Cl)[C@@H](COC(=O)Nc1cc2cc(F)ccc2cn1)CC(C)(C)COP(=O)(O)O

nearest known ligand 0.31

Predicted protein targets (top 2)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ANO1 Q5XXA6 1/20 0.31
ABL1 P00519 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL210497 1.00 ANO1 (0.31) ANO1ABL1
SCHEMBL210499 1.00 ANO1 (0.31) ANO1ABL1
SCHEMBL210690 0.99 ANO1 (0.31) ANO1
SCHEMBL4348520 0.95 ANO1 (0.32) ANO1ABL1
SCHEMBL15827331 0.95 ABL1 (0.30) ABL1
SCHEMBL210689 0.94 ANO1 (0.31) ANO1
SCHEMBL211624 0.94 PIN1 (0.32) ANO1
SCHEMBL211878 0.94 ANO1 (0.31) ANO1
SCHEMBL211876 0.94 ANO1 (0.31) ANO1
SCHEMBL213612 0.94 ANO1 (0.31) ANO1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8895582-B2 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2014-11-25 US disclosed
US-8759374-B2 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2014-06-24 US disclosed
US-20130053348-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS QIAN XIANGPING (US) 2013-02-28 US disclosed
US-20120135964-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS QIAN XIANGPING (US) 2012-05-31 US disclosed
US-8088793-B2 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2012-01-03 US disclosed
US-20090275537-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. 2009-11-05 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090275537-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods MYLK, MYH2, MYH10 ANO1 1073/4885ABL1 956/4885
US-20120135964-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS MYLK, MYH2, MYH10 ANO1 1073/4885ABL1 956/4885
US-20130053348-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS MYLK, MYH2, MYH10 ANO1 1073/4885ABL1 956/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.