SCHEMBL2298087

SCHEMBL2298087

CCC(CC)n1c(O)nc2ncc(Cl)c(-c3ccc(C(F)(F)F)cc3)c21

nearest known ligand 0.38

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HEXA P06865 1/20 0.34
HEXB P07686 1/20 0.34
DYRK1A Q13627 2/20 0.33
DYRK2 Q92630 2/20 0.33
GABRP O00591 1/20 0.33
GABRD O14764 1/20 0.33
GABRA1 P14867 1/20 0.33
GABRB1 P18505 1/20 0.33
GABRG2 P18507 1/20 0.33
GABRB3 P28472 1/20 0.33
GABRA5 P31644 1/20 0.33
GABRA3 P34903 1/20 0.33
GABRA2 P47869 1/20 0.33
GABRB2 P47870 1/20 0.33
GABRA4 P48169 1/20 0.33
GABRE P78334 1/20 0.33
GABRA6 Q16445 1/20 0.33
GABRG1 Q8N1C3 1/20 0.33
GABRG3 Q99928 1/20 0.33
GABRQ Q9UN88 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2297784 0.89 TNF (0.31) CDK2
SCHEMBL2299439 0.88 MET (0.33)
SCHEMBL2300689 0.88 USP7 (0.34) HEXAHEXBCNR1CRHR1
SCHEMBL2299674 0.88 USP7 (0.35) CCNA2CDK2
SCHEMBL2297568 0.86 USP7 (0.32) ADORA1
SCHEMBL2296495 0.86 HRH3 (0.36) ADORA1HRH3
SCHEMBL3399425 0.84 FYN (0.32)
SCHEMBL2300210 0.84 ELANE (0.37) TRPV3
SCHEMBL2298477 0.83 JAK1 (0.38) HEXAHEXBGABRA2GABRB2CDK2
SCHEMBL2302651 0.83 PGR (0.36)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS YANG ZHE (US) 2011-12-22 US claimed
EP-2244711-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Incorporated (US) 2010-11-03 EP claimed
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2009-10-08 US claimed
WO-2009099594-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2009-08-13 WO claimed
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS YANG ZHE (US) 2011-12-22 US disclosed
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS YANG ZHE (US) 2011-12-22 US disclosed
US-7989469-B2 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2011-08-02 US disclosed
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2009-10-08 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2 HEXA 2238/4885HEXB 2374/4885DYRK1A 1340/4885
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2 HEXA 2324/4885HEXB 2526/4885DYRK1A 1794/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.