SCHEMBL2301190

SCHEMBL2301190

CCC(CC)n1c(O)nc2ncc(Cl)c(-c3ccccc3C(N)=O)c21

nearest known ligand 0.36

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CTSA P10619 2/20 0.36
DPP4 P27487 2/20 0.36
DPP8 Q6V1X1 1/20 0.36
MAPK8 P45983 1/20 0.34
PPARG P37231 4/20 0.33
CSNK1A1 P48729 2/20 0.32
CDC7 O00311 1/20 0.32
DAPK3 O43293 1/20 0.32
JAK2 O60674 1/20 0.32
ROCK2 O75116 1/20 0.32
PRKD3 O94806 1/20 0.32
MAP4K4 O95819 1/20 0.32
PAK4 O96013 1/20 0.32
PIM1 P11309 1/20 0.32
PRKACA P17612 1/20 0.32
CDK2 P24941 1/20 0.32
SYK P43405 1/20 0.32
CLK2 P49760 1/20 0.32
GSK3A P49840 1/20 0.32
GSK3B P49841 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2297731 0.83 HSP90AA1 (0.33) CTSAKDM4E
SCHEMBL2299693 0.82 ALDH1A1 (0.32)
SCHEMBL3768994 0.81 BACE1 (0.32) BACE1
SCHEMBL2299181 0.81 USP7 (0.38) MAP4K4
SCHEMBL4114786 0.80 L3MBTL1 (0.35) CTSADPP4PPARGKDM4EL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL2301194 0.80 PPARG (0.40) CTSADPP4DPP8PPARG
SCHEMBL3399505 0.80 ATR (0.30)
SCHEMBL2299859 0.78 LATS1 (0.32) DPP4
SCHEMBL2300187 0.76 KDR (0.37) MAPK8
SCHEMBL2299674 0.76 USP7 (0.35) CDK2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS YANG ZHE (US) 2011-12-22 US claimed
EP-2244711-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Incorporated (US) 2010-11-03 EP claimed
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2009-10-08 US claimed
WO-2009099594-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2009-08-13 WO claimed
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS YANG ZHE (US) 2011-12-22 US disclosed
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS YANG ZHE (US) 2011-12-22 US disclosed
US-7989469-B2 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2011-08-02 US disclosed
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2009-10-08 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2 CTSA 2255/4885DPP4 2764/4885DPP8 2749/4885
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2 CTSA 2050/4885DPP4 2786/4885DPP8 2860/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.