SCHEMBL25110795

SCHEMBL25110795

CC(C)CN1CCC(N(C)Cc2ccc(N3CCN(C)CC3)cc2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ RORC P51449 5/20 0.44
▸ KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.43
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.43
▸ LTA4H P09960 1/20 0.42
▸ HRH3 Q9Y5N1 2/20 0.41
▸ CHKA P35790 2/20 0.40
▸ HTR1D P28221 1/20 0.40
▸ HTR1B P28222 1/20 0.40
▸ HRH4 Q9H3N8 1/20 0.40
▸ NCF1 P14598 1/20 0.39
▸ NOS3 P29474 2/20 0.38
▸ NOS1 P29475 2/20 0.38
▸ NOS2 P35228 2/20 0.38
▸ LSS P48449 1/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL25108872 0.90 KDM4E (0.43) RORCKDM4EALDH1A1HRH3HTR1D
SCHEMBL24514077 0.89 MAPT (0.43) RORCKDM4EALDH1A1HRH3HTR1D
SCHEMBL22802982 0.84 RORC (0.43) RORCCHKAHTR1DHTR1BNCF1
SCHEMBL21655001 0.81 HRH3 (0.45) KDM4EALDH1A1LTA4HHRH3HTR1D
SCHEMBL25111065 0.75 MAPT (0.41) RORCKDM4EALDH1A1HRH3HTR1D
SCHEMBL9451684 0.73 KDM4E (0.49) RORCKDM4EALDH1A1LTA4HHRH3
SCHEMBL25110794 0.73 KDM4E (0.43) RORCKDM4EALDH1A1LTA4HHRH3
SCHEMBL25108491 0.73 CHKA (0.40) RORCCHKAHTR1DHTR1BNCF1
SCHEMBL25108893 0.73 RORC (0.42) RORCHRH3CHKANCF1
SCHEMBL25110409 0.71 SIGMAR1 (0.45) RORCKDM4EHRH3CHKA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230149549-A1 SMARCA DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF KYMERA THERAPEUTICS, INC. 2023-05-18 — — US disclosed
US-20230072658-A1 SMARCA DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF KYMERA THERAPEUTICS, INC. 2023-03-09 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230149549-A1 SMARCA DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF SMARCA1, SMARCB1, SMARCE1 RORC 2347/4885KDM4E 613/4885ALDH1A1 3473/4885
US-20230072658-A1 SMARCA DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF SMARCA1, SMARCB1, SMARCE1 RORC 2353/4885KDM4E 624/4885ALDH1A1 3736/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback