SCHEMBL2542871

SCHEMBL2542871

CC1CN(CCC(=O)Nc2nc3ccc(Sc4cnc5ncccn45)cc3s2)CC(C)N1

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 6/20 0.43
LMNA P02545 5/20 0.43
RAB9A P51151 5/20 0.43
STAT1 P42224 1/20 0.43
NPC1 O15118 4/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.39
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.39
ACHE P22303 2/20 0.39
P2RX7 Q99572 2/20 0.39
HSD17B10 Q99714 3/20 0.39
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.38
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.38
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.38
HTT P42858 2/20 0.38
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.38
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.38
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.38
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.38
POLB P06746 1/20 0.38
ADRB2 P07550 1/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2546981 0.92 SMN1; SMN2 (0.42) SMN1; SMN2LMNAMAPTALDH1A1MEN1
SCHEMBL2547349 0.92 SMN1; SMN2 (0.45) SMN1; SMN2LMNARAB9ASTAT1NPC1
SCHEMBL2541005 0.88 ACHE (0.46) SMN1; SMN2LMNARAB9ASTAT1NPC1
SCHEMBL2541766 0.88 LMNA (0.36) SMN1; SMN2LMNARAB9ASTAT1NPC1
SCHEMBL2541008 0.88 PIK3CA (0.49) SMN1; SMN2LMNARAB9ASTAT1NPC1
SCHEMBL2544044 0.85 MET (0.48) SMN1; SMN2LMNARAB9ASTAT1MAPT
SCHEMBL2542845 0.85 SMN1; SMN2 (0.42) SMN1; SMN2LMNARAB9ASTAT1MAPT
SCHEMBL2541760 0.84 ACHE (0.42) SMN1; SMN2LMNARAB9ASTAT1NPC1
SCHEMBL2543258 0.83 RAB9A (0.42) SMN1; SMN2LMNARAB9ASTAT1NPC1
SCHEMBL2547102 0.83 NPC1 (0.46) SMN1; SMN2LMNARAB9ASTAT1NPC1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2011-10-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS TPMT, MET, PAICS SMN1; SMN2 2888/4885LMNA 4476/4885RAB9A 2193/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.