SCHEMBL2544077

SCHEMBL2544077

O=C(CC1CCOCC1)Nc1nc2ccc(Sc3cnc4ncccn34)cc2s1

nearest known ligand 0.45

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MET P08581 2/20 0.45
CSNK1D P48730 1/20 0.45
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.44
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.44
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.44
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.44
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.44
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.44
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.44
HTT P42858 2/20 0.43
CLK1 P49759 2/20 0.43
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.43
LCK P06239 1/20 0.41
POLB P06746 1/20 0.41
USP30 Q70CQ3 2/20 0.41
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.40
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.40
GAA P10253 1/20 0.40
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.40
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2546596 0.91 ALDH1A1 (0.45) METCSNK1DKMT2ASMN1; SMN2MEN1
SCHEMBL1838470 0.88 CASP3 (0.45) METKMT2ASMN1; SMN2MEN1RAB9A
SCHEMBL2542595 0.87 ALDH1A1 (0.57) METKMT2ASMN1; SMN2MEN1RAB9A
SCHEMBL2544044 0.86 MET (0.48) METKMT2ASMN1; SMN2MEN1RAB9A
SCHEMBL2540992 0.86 ALDH1A1 (0.48) KMT2ASMN1; SMN2MEN1KDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1841257 0.85 CASP3 (0.50) METKMT2ASMN1; SMN2MEN1RAB9A
SCHEMBL1836150 0.85 MAPT (0.42) KMT2ASMN1; SMN2MEN1RAB9AKDM4E
SCHEMBL2540705 0.84 RAB9A (0.42) KMT2ASMN1; SMN2MEN1RAB9ANPC1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL2547151 0.84 MAPT (0.42) KMT2ASMN1; SMN2MEN1RAB9AKDM4E
SCHEMBL2545248 0.83 MET (0.40) METCSNK1DKMT2ASMN1; SMN2MEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2011-10-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS TPMT, MET, PAICS MET 2/4885CSNK1D 126/4885KMT2A 1097/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.