Doxifluridine

Doxifluridine

SCHEMBL2554049

C[C@H]1O[C@@H](n2cc(F)c(=O)[nH]c2=O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]1O.O=P(O)(O)O.O=P(O)(O)O.O=P(O)(O)O

nearest known ligand 0.90

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

TYMS

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Doxifluridine. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.90
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.90
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.90
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.90
PMP22 Q01453 1/20 0.90
HBB P68871 1/20 0.90
P2RY6 Q15077 4/20 0.58
P2RY14 Q15391 4/20 0.58
NT5E P21589 1/20 0.58
P2RY2 P41231 3/20 0.46
DNPH1 O43598 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Doxifluridine SCHEMBL2553189 1.00 LMNA (0.90) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRMAPTPMP22
Doxifluridine SCHEMBL14291576 0.95 LMNA (1.00) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRMAPTPMP22
Doxifluridine SCHEMBL12932255 0.95 LMNA (1.00) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRMAPTPMP22
Doxifluridine SCHEMBL4932137 0.95 LMNA (1.00) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRMAPTPMP22
Doxifluridine SCHEMBL98005 0.95 LMNA (1.00) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRMAPTPMP22
Doxifluridine SCHEMBL8095 0.95 LMNA (1.00) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRMAPTPMP22
Doxifluridine SCHEMBL8094 0.95 LMNA (1.00) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRMAPTPMP22
Doxifluridine SCHEMBL14564897 0.95 LMNA (1.00) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRMAPTPMP22
Doxifluridine SCHEMBL15060572 0.95 LMNA (1.00) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRMAPTPMP22
Doxifluridine SCHEMBL10079621 0.95 LMNA (1.00) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRMAPTPMP22

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2552453-A2 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING OR AMELIORATING CANCER USING GEMCITABINE-5'-ELAIDATE Clavis Pharma ASA (NO) 2013-02-06 EP disclosed
US-20130005678-A1 Methods and Compositions for Treating or Ameliorating Cancer Using Gemcitabine-5'-Elaidate CLAVIS PHARMA ASA (NO) 2013-01-03 US disclosed
WO-2011121453-A2 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING OR AMELIORATING CANCER USING GEMCITABINE-5'-ELAIDATE CLAVIS PHARMA ASA (NO) 2011-10-06 WO disclosed
WO-2006102533-A2 PHARMACEUTICALLY ACTIVE LIPID-BASED FORMULATION OF NUCLEOSIDE-LIPID CONJUGATES NEOPHARM, INC. (US) 2006-09-28 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130005678-A1 Methods and Compositions for Treating or Ameliorating Cancer Using Gemcitabine-5'-Elaidate SLC29A1, NUDT1, SLC29A2 LMNA 2677/4885SMN1; SMN2 2683/4885TSHR 3642/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.