SCHEMBL2865845

SCHEMBL2865845

C#Cc1cnc2ccc(OC(SC)C(=O)NC(C)(C#N)CF)cc2c1

nearest known ligand 0.31

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MET P08581 2/20 0.31
SCN9A Q15858 2/20 0.31
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.31
F2 P00734 1/20 0.31
GLA P06280 1/20 0.31
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.31
PDPK1 O15530 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL633067 0.92 SCN9A (0.35) METSCN9AALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL3726982 0.91 SCN9A (0.31) SCN9AALDH1A1F2GLAHPGD
SCHEMBL633021 0.90 ALDH1A1 (0.32) SCN9AALDH1A1F2GLAHPGD
SCHEMBL3738591 0.89 MET (0.33) METSCN9AALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL3730775 0.88 ALDH1A1 (0.33) METSCN9AALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL3725939 0.87
SCHEMBL3730918 0.86 MAPT (0.35) METSCN9AALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL155250 0.86 SCN9A (0.33) METSCN9AALDH1A1F2GLA
SCHEMBL2868242 0.86
SCHEMBL632771 0.86 HPGDS (0.36) METSCN9AALDH1A1F2GLA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8415272-B2 Quinoline derivatives and their use as fungicides SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) 2013-04-09 US disclosed
US-8415272-B2 Quinoline derivatives and their use as fungicides SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) 2013-04-09 US disclosed
US-8415272-B2 Quinoline derivatives and their use as fungicides SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) 2013-04-09 US disclosed
US-20100280068-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC. (US) 2010-11-04 US disclosed
US-20100280068-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC. (US) 2010-11-04 US disclosed
US-20100280068-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC. (US) 2010-11-04 US disclosed
EP-2231614-A2 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES Syngenta Participations AG (CH) 2010-09-29 EP disclosed
WO-2009087098-A2 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2009-07-16 WO disclosed
WO-2009087098-A2 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2009-07-16 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100280068-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES CYP1A1, CYP3A7, CYP1A2 MET 4186/4885SCN9A 1091/4885ALDH1A1 350/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.