SCHEMBL2904068

SCHEMBL2904068

Cc1ccc(CN2CCN(C=CC(=O)c3ccccc3Cl)CC2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.51
POLB P06746 1/20 0.51
FAAH O00519 1/20 0.50
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.49
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.47
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.47
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.47
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.47
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.47
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.46
ATM Q13315 2/20 0.45
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.45
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.45
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2903101 0.90 SIGMAR1 (0.51) FAAHMEN1KMT2AATM
SCHEMBL2907155 0.89 ALDH1A1 (0.56) LMNAFAAHKDM4EMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL2905103 0.88 F2R (0.57) FAAHMEN1KMT2AATM
SCHEMBL2904076 0.84 KMT2A (0.49) LMNAFAAHKDM4EMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL2905713 0.84 ALDH1A1 (0.46) POLBFAAHSMN1; SMN2KDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL2905724 0.84 FAAH (0.53) LMNAPOLBFAAHSMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL2906083 0.83 SIGMAR1 (0.57) FAAHSMN1; SMN2KDM4EMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL2910357 0.83 SMN1; SMN2 (0.52) LMNAPOLBFAAHSMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL2909313 0.81 FAAH (0.52) FAAHSMN1; SMN2KDM4EMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL4379112 0.81 P2RX7 (0.53) LMNASMN1; SMN2KDM4EALDH1A1MAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120232097-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS PEREZ MICHEL (FR) 2012-09-13 US claimed
EP-2041104-B1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS PF MEDICAMENT (FR) 2010-08-18 EP claimed
US-20090176803-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT (FR) 2009-07-09 US claimed
EP-2041104-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS Pierre Fabre Medicament (FR) 2009-04-01 EP claimed
WO-2007147824-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT (FR) 2007-12-27 WO claimed
EP-2041104-B1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS PF MEDICAMENT (FR) 2010-08-18 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090176803-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS F2R, F2RL1, F2RL3 LMNA 1615/4885POLB 3850/4885FAAH 506/4885
US-20120232097-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS F2R, F2RL1, F2RL3 LMNA 1615/4885POLB 3850/4885FAAH 506/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.