SCHEMBL2983707

SCHEMBL2983707

CN(C)C1(Cc2cccc(Cl)c2)CCC(NC(=O)COc2ccccc2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
POLB P06746 1/20 0.53
MCHR1 Q99705 9/20 0.51
ATF4 P18848 1/20 0.49
SIGMAR1 Q99720 1/20 0.47
EPHX2 P34913 1/20 0.47
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.46
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.46
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.46
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.46
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.46
ADIPOR2 Q86V24 1/20 0.46
ADIPOR1 Q96A54 1/20 0.46
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.45
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2987366 0.95 MCHR1 (0.54) POLBMCHR1ATF4EPHX2SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL2987178 0.94 ATF4 (0.58) POLBMCHR1ATF4EPHX2SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL2978691 0.90 MCHR1 (0.51) POLBMCHR1SMN1; SMN2CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL2981330 0.89 POLB (0.51) POLBSMN1; SMN2CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C19
SCHEMBL2987483 0.89 ATF4 (0.61) POLBMCHR1ATF4SMN1; SMN2USP2
SCHEMBL2982908 0.89 MCHR1 (0.50) POLBMCHR1ATF4SIGMAR1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL2987754 0.88 POLB (0.50) POLBSIGMAR1SMN1; SMN2CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL2987025 0.88 SIGMAR1 (0.47) MCHR1SIGMAR1EPHX2
SCHEMBL5162540 0.88 MCHR1 (0.46) POLBMCHR1SIGMAR1
SCHEMBL2981298 0.87 ATF4 (0.56) POLBMCHR1ATF4SMN1; SMN2LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7786328-B2 Cyclohexyl-1,4-diamine compounds GRUENENTHAL GMBH (DE) 2010-08-31 US claimed
JP-2007536322-A 2007-12-13 JP claimed
US-20070281954-A1 Cyclohexyl-1,4-diamine compounds GRUENENTHAL GMBH (DE) 2007-12-06 US claimed
EP-1747191-A1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXYL-1,4-DIAMINE DERIVATIVES WITH A CHAIN EXTENSION Grünenthal GmbH (DE) 2007-01-31 EP claimed
WO-2005110975-A1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXYL-1,4-DIAMINE DERIVATIVES WITH A CHAIN EXTENSION Grünenthal GmbH (DE) 2005-11-24 WO claimed
US-7786328-B2 Cyclohexyl-1,4-diamine compounds GRUENENTHAL GMBH (DE) 2010-08-31 US disclosed
US-20070281954-A1 Cyclohexyl-1,4-diamine compounds GRUENENTHAL GMBH (DE) 2007-12-06 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070281954-A1 Cyclohexyl-1,4-diamine compounds DPYD, PKD1, AOC1 POLB 1844/4885MCHR1 1826/4885ATF4 1845/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.