SCHEMBL3065659

SCHEMBL3065659

O=C(O)[C@@H]1C[C@@H](S(=O)(=O)c2ccc(OCC(F)(F)F)cc2Cl)CN1C(=O)C1(c2cccc(Cl)c2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.60

Predicted protein targets (top 4)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CTSL P07711 20/20 0.60
CTSS P25774 20/20 0.60
CTSK P43235 8/20 0.53
CTSB P07858 7/20 0.53

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3061944 0.94 CTSL (0.61) CTSLCTSSCTSKCTSB
SCHEMBL15327138 0.93 CTSL (0.57) CTSLCTSSCTSKCTSB
SCHEMBL15327139 0.93 CTSL (0.57) CTSLCTSSCTSKCTSB
SCHEMBL3065668 0.93 CTSL (0.57) CTSLCTSSCTSKCTSB
SCHEMBL3074207 0.92 CTSL (0.57) CTSLCTSSCTSKCTSB
SCHEMBL3068594 0.91 CTSL (0.64) CTSLCTSSCTSKCTSB
SCHEMBL3074843 0.91 CTSS (0.59) CTSLCTSSCTSKCTSB
SCHEMBL3064228 0.90 CTSL (0.57) CTSLCTSSCTSKCTSB
SCHEMBL3056115 0.90 CTSL (0.57) CTSLCTSSCTSKCTSB
SCHEMBL3076067 0.89 CTSL (0.56) CTSLCTSSCTSKCTSB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2421826-B1 PROLINE DERIVATIVES AS CATHEPSIN INHIBITORS HOFFMANN LA ROCHE (CH) 2013-10-23 EP claimed
US-20100267722-A1 NOVEL PROLINE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2010-10-21 US claimed
EP-2421826-B1 PROLINE DERIVATIVES AS CATHEPSIN INHIBITORS HOFFMANN LA ROCHE (CH) 2013-10-23 EP disclosed
WO-2010121918-A1 PROLINE DERIVATIVES AS CATHEPSIN INHIBITORS F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2010-10-28 WO disclosed
US-20100267722-A1 NOVEL PROLINE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2010-10-21 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100267722-A1 NOVEL PROLINE DERIVATIVES PRAP1, PRR12, SLC6A7 CTSL 178/4885CTSS 1542/4885CTSK 1586/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.