SCHEMBL30657491

SCHEMBL30657491

CC[C@H](C)[C@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(=O)O)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@@H]1CCCN1C(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@@H]1CCCN1C(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(C)=O)C(C)C)C(C)C)C(C)C)C(=O)N[C@H](C=O)CC(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ F2 P00734 2/20 0.42
▸ TGM2 P21980 1/20 0.42
▸ TASP1 Q9H6P5 1/20 0.42
▸ NTSR1 P30989 5/20 0.41
▸ NTSR2 O95665 4/20 0.41
▸ CALCRL Q16602 1/20 0.41
▸ NPY1R P25929 2/20 0.41
▸ MAPK8 P45983 1/20 0.40
▸ MAPK9 P45984 1/20 0.40
▸ MAPK10 P53779 1/20 0.40
▸ RAMP3 O60896 2/20 0.40
▸ CALCR P30988 2/20 0.40
▸ ABCB1 P08183 2/20 0.39
▸ SORT1 Q99523 3/20 0.39
▸ NPY2R P49146 1/20 0.39
▸ NPY4R P50391 1/20 0.39
▸ NPY5R Q15761 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL30657496 0.97 CALCRL (0.45) F2TGM2TASP1CALCRLNPY1R
SCHEMBL30657490 0.95 CALCRL (0.43) F2CALCRLNPY1RRAMP3CALCR
SCHEMBL29726608 0.95 CALCRL (0.44) F2CALCRLNPY1RRAMP3CALCR
SCHEMBL30657497 0.93 CALCRL (0.44) TGM2CALCRLABCB1
SCHEMBL31140791 0.87 CALCRL (0.46) F2CALCRLNPY1RRAMP3CALCR
SCHEMBL29726644 0.87 CALCRL (0.46) F2CALCRLNPY1RRAMP3CALCR
SCHEMBL30657495 0.86 F2 (0.47) F2CALCRLRAMP3CALCR
SCHEMBL30657494 0.83 CALCRL (0.51) NTSR1NTSR2CALCRLNPY1RSORT1
SCHEMBL29946190 0.82 GZMB (0.52) F2TASP1NTSR1NTSR2NPY1R
SCHEMBL2399597 0.81 F2 (0.45) F2NTSR1NTSR2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
CN-118320091-A Compositions of caspase inhibitors and methods of use thereof 香港大学 2024-07-12 — — CN disclosed
EP-4397770-A1 STABILISATION AND ISOLATION OF EXTRACELLULAR NUCLEIC ACIDS PreAnalytiX GmbH (CH) 2024-07-10 — — EP disclosed
US-20240024405-A1 COMPOSITIONS OF CASPASE INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG (CN) 2024-01-25 — — US disclosed
EP-3401406-B1 STABILISATION AND ISOLATION OF EXTRACELLULAR NUCLEIC ACIDS PREANALYTIX GMBH (CH) 2023-11-29 — — EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20240024405-A1 COMPOSITIONS OF CASPASE INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF CASP6, CASP1, CASP3 F2 1847/4885TGM2 1542/4885TASP1 615/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback