SCHEMBL3267162

SCHEMBL3267162

COc1ccc(F)cc1CNc1cc(N)c2cc(NCc3ccccc3)ccc2n1

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 5)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NTRK1 P04629 11/20 0.52
DHFR P00374 6/20 0.51
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.47
PDGFRB P09619 1/20 0.45
PDGFRA P16234 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3268429 0.93 DHFR (0.50) NTRK1DHFRKCNH2PDGFRBPDGFRA
SCHEMBL3267190 0.92 DHFR (0.50) DHFRPDGFRBPDGFRA
SCHEMBL3268743 0.91 NTRK1 (0.48) NTRK1DHFRKCNH2
SCHEMBL3267029 0.89 DHFR (0.52) NTRK1DHFR
SCHEMBL3271309 0.88 DHFR (0.53) DHFR
SCHEMBL3268137 0.84 CYP1A2 (0.47) DHFR
SCHEMBL3273799 0.79 KCNH2 (0.46) NTRK1DHFRKCNH2PDGFRBPDGFRA
SCHEMBL3268616 0.76 PDGFRB (0.53) PDGFRBPDGFRA
SCHEMBL3267094 0.75 CYP1A2 (0.47) NTRK1KCNH2
SCHEMBL3268552 0.75 CYP1A2 (0.50) NTRK1KCNH2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8399674-B2 Quinolines HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2013-03-19 US claimed
US-20120136018-A1 QUINOLINES KOLCZEWSKI SABINE (DE) 2012-05-31 US claimed
EP-2195296-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS 5HT5A RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS F. Hoffmann-Roche AG (CH) 2010-06-16 EP claimed
US-20090088451-A1 QUINOLINES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2009-04-02 US claimed
WO-2009040290-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS 5HT5A RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2009-04-02 WO claimed
US-8399674-B2 Quinolines HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2013-03-19 US disclosed
US-20120136018-A1 QUINOLINES KOLCZEWSKI SABINE (DE) 2012-05-31 US disclosed
EP-2195296-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS 5HT5A RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS F. Hoffmann-Roche AG (CH) 2010-06-16 EP disclosed
US-20090088451-A1 QUINOLINES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2009-04-02 US disclosed
WO-2009040290-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS 5HT5A RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2009-04-02 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090088451-A1 QUINOLINES HTR5A, HTR1A, HTR1E NTRK1 529/4885DHFR 499/4885KCNH2 524/4885
US-20120136018-A1 QUINOLINES HTR5A, HTR1A, HTR1E NTRK1 529/4885DHFR 499/4885KCNH2 524/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.