Trifluoroacetic Acid

Trifluoroacetic Acid

SCHEMBL3340260

NC(=O)c1cccc(-c2ccc(CNCc3cccc(F)c3)cc2)c1.O=C(O)C(F)(F)F

nearest known ligand 0.50

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SRC P12931 2/20 0.50
OPRM1 P35372 2/20 0.49
OPRD1 P41143 2/20 0.49
OPRK1 P41145 2/20 0.49
CDC7 O00311 1/20 0.47
ROCK2 O75116 1/20 0.47
MAP4K4 O95819 1/20 0.47
PIM1 P11309 1/20 0.47
CDK2 P24941 1/20 0.47
GSK3B P49841 1/20 0.47
CLK4 Q9HAZ1 1/20 0.47
PARP1 P09874 1/20 0.46
DPP4 P27487 1/20 0.44
CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.43
NR3C2 P08235 1/20 0.42
FFAR1 O14842 1/20 0.42
DHODH Q02127 1/20 0.42
HTR5A P47898 1/20 0.42
FNTA P49354 1/20 0.42
FNTB P49356 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1788221 0.93 OPRM1 (0.54) SRCOPRM1OPRD1OPRK1CDC7
SCHEMBL1345554 0.84 DPP4 (0.52) OPRM1OPRD1OPRK1PARP1DPP4
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL3341972 0.84 HTR5A (0.58) OPRM1OPRD1OPRK1HTR5AHDAC1
SCHEMBL1347900 0.84 CNR1 (0.55) OPRM1OPRD1OPRK1CNR1NR3C2
SCHEMBL1348145 0.84 OPRM1 (0.57) SRCOPRM1OPRD1OPRK1CDC7
SCHEMBL12607844 0.84 OPRM1 (0.52) SRCOPRM1OPRD1OPRK1CDC7
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL3339664 0.83 DPP4 (0.51) OPRM1OPRD1OPRK1PARP1DPP4
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL3339542 0.83 OPRM1 (0.52) SRCOPRM1OPRD1OPRK1CDC7
SCHEMBL1347829 0.83 BACE1 (0.54) CNR1DHODHHDAC1
SCHEMBL1348553 0.81 DHODH (0.60) CNR1NR3C2DHODHHDAC1HDAC2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20140323487-A1 Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC 2014-10-30 US disclosed
US-20100113512-A1 METHOD OF TREATMENT USING NOVEL ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS IGNAR DIANE MICHELE 2010-05-06 US disclosed
EP-2054383-A2 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS SmithKline Beecham Corporation (US) 2009-05-06 EP disclosed
WO-2008021849-A2 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2008-02-21 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100113512-A1 METHOD OF TREATMENT USING NOVEL ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS OPRL1, OPRD1, OPRK1 SRC 3260/4885OPRM1 4/4885OPRD1 2/4885
US-20140323487-A1 Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors OPRL1, OPRM1, OPRK1 SRC 2137/4885OPRM1 2/4885OPRD1 4/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.