SCHEMBL3506038

SCHEMBL3506038

O=[N+]([O-])c1ccc(Sc2nc3ccccc3s2)c2nsnc12

nearest known ligand 0.59

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPT P10636 7/20 0.59
LMNA P02545 6/20 0.59
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.59
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.59
PKM P14618 3/20 0.59
HTT P42858 3/20 0.59
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.59
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.59
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.59
HPGD P15428 5/20 0.56
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 3/20 0.56
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.56
GAA P10253 3/20 0.56
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.56
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.56
CYP3A4 P08684 4/20 0.48
CYP2C19 P33261 4/20 0.48
CYP2C9 P11712 3/20 0.48
TXNRD1 Q16881 1/20 0.47
TXNRD3 Q86VQ6 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5281465 0.86 GSTP1 (0.62) MAPTLMNAKMT2ASMN1; SMN2PKM
SCHEMBL3511031 0.79 TXNRD1 (0.53) MAPTKMT2AHTTMAPK1NPC1
SCHEMBL29405540 0.78 MAPT (0.71) MAPTLMNAKMT2ASMN1; SMN2PKM
SCHEMBL137897 0.78 MAPT (0.71) MAPTLMNAKMT2ASMN1; SMN2PKM
SCHEMBL13236138 0.77 MAPT (0.60) MAPTLMNAKMT2ASMN1; SMN2PKM
SCHEMBL10752315 0.77 MAPT (0.63) MAPTLMNAKMT2ASMN1; SMN2PKM
SCHEMBL11366224 0.76 MAPT (0.69) MAPTLMNAKMT2ASMN1; SMN2PKM
SCHEMBL13355661 0.74 MAPT (0.66) MAPTLMNAKMT2ASMN1; SMN2PKM
SCHEMBL24118868 0.72 KMT2A (0.57) MAPTLMNAKMT2ASMN1; SMN2PKM
SCHEMBL11649358 0.72 FBP1 (0.61) MAPTLMNAKMT2ASMN1; SMN2PKM

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100184601-A1 Method and Means Relating to Multiple Herbicide Resistance in Plants UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM (GB) 2010-07-22 US claimed
EP-2190290-A2 METHOD AND MEANS RELATING TO MULTIPLE HERBICIDE RESISTANCE IN PLANTS University Of Durham (GB) 2010-06-02 EP claimed
WO-2009034396-A2 METHOD AND MEANS RELATING TO MULTIPLE HERBICIDE RESISTANCE IN PLANTS UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM (GB) 2009-03-19 WO claimed
US-20100184601-A1 Method and Means Relating to Multiple Herbicide Resistance in Plants UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM (GB) 2010-07-22 US disclosed
EP-2190290-A2 METHOD AND MEANS RELATING TO MULTIPLE HERBICIDE RESISTANCE IN PLANTS University Of Durham (GB) 2010-06-02 EP disclosed
WO-2009034396-A2 METHOD AND MEANS RELATING TO MULTIPLE HERBICIDE RESISTANCE IN PLANTS UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM (GB) 2009-03-19 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100184601-A1 Method and Means Relating to Multiple Herbicide Resistance in Plants GSTO1, GSTP1, GSR MAPT 3504/4885LMNA 4722/4885KMT2A 1267/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.