SCHEMBL3572183

SCHEMBL3572183

O=C(O)CC1CCN(Cc2ccccc2)CC1=O

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.48
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.48
SIGMAR1 Q99720 1/20 0.48
CXCR4 P61073 1/20 0.47
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.47
DRD4 P21917 1/20 0.47
DRD3 P35462 1/20 0.47
ACHE P22303 2/20 0.46
FAAH O00519 1/20 0.46
BCHE P06276 1/20 0.46
CCR3 P51677 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL995393 0.86 ACHE (0.50) MEN1TSHRKMT2ASIGMAR1ACHE
SCHEMBL5974931 0.84 CCR3 (0.57) SIGMAR1DRD2DRD4DRD3ACHE
SCHEMBL5975118 0.84 CCR3 (0.57) SIGMAR1DRD2DRD4DRD3ACHE
SCHEMBL5974936 0.84 CCR3 (0.57) SIGMAR1DRD2DRD4DRD3ACHE
SCHEMBL12706739 0.83 SIGMAR1 (0.49) SIGMAR1ACHEBCHE
SCHEMBL31288163 0.82 ACHE (0.53) SIGMAR1DRD2DRD4DRD3ACHE
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6660125 0.82 CCR3 (0.55) SIGMAR1DRD2ACHECCR3
SCHEMBL27596453 0.82 ACHE (0.49) SIGMAR1DRD2DRD4DRD3ACHE
SCHEMBL3709844 0.79 KMT2A (0.50) MEN1TSHRKMT2ASIGMAR1DRD2
SCHEMBL11178158 0.79 DRD2 (0.49) SIGMAR1DRD2ACHECCR3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
WO-2016192630-A1 COMPOUND HAVING KINASE INHIBITING ACTIVITY, METHOD OF PREPARING SAME, AND USE OF SAME 中国科学院上海药物研究所 2016-12-08 WO disclosed
US-7795262-B2 Piperazinyl oxoalkyl tetrahydroisoquinolines and related analogues NEUROGEN CORPORATION (US) 2010-09-14 US disclosed
EP-1998620-A4 PIPERAZINYL OXOALKYL TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINES AND RELATED ANALOGUES NEUROGEN CORP (US) 2009-09-02 EP disclosed
EP-1998620-A2 PIPERAZINYL OXOALKYL TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINES AND RELATED ANALOGUES Neurogen Corporation (US) 2008-12-10 EP disclosed
US-20070232591-A1 Piperazinyl oxoalkyl tetrahydroisoquinolines and related analogues NEUROGEN CORPORATION 2007-10-04 US disclosed
WO-2007106349-A2 PIPERAZINYL OXOALKYL TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINES AND RELATED ANALOGUES NEUROGEN CORPORATION (US) 2007-09-20 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070232591-A1 Piperazinyl oxoalkyl tetrahydroisoquinolines and related analogues HRH3, HRH4, HRH1 MEN1 2317/4885TSHR 314/4885KMT2A 566/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.