SCHEMBL3782497

SCHEMBL3782497

Cc1ccc(S(=O)(=O)Nc2cc(C(F)(F)F)ccc2S(N)(=O)=O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.64

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PTGES2 Q9H7Z7 4/20 0.64
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.57
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.57
FFAR4 Q5NUL3 2/20 0.56
FFAR1 O14842 1/20 0.56
CDK1 P06493 1/20 0.56
CCNB1 P14635 1/20 0.56
CCNA2 P20248 1/20 0.56
CDK2 P24941 1/20 0.56
CDK7 P50613 1/20 0.56
CCNH P51946 1/20 0.56
CCNA1 P78396 1/20 0.56
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.54
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.54
MCL1 Q07820 2/20 0.54
HSD17B2 P37059 2/20 0.52
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.48
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.48
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3787802 0.86 PTGES2 (0.71) PTGES2LMNACA1CA2MCL1
SCHEMBL15228509 0.81 MCL1 (0.70) LMNASMN1; SMN2FFAR4FFAR1CDK1
SCHEMBL3534455 0.81 FFAR1 (0.59) PTGES2LMNASMN1; SMN2FFAR4FFAR1
SCHEMBL28728816 0.78 CCR2 (0.57) LMNASMN1; SMN2FFAR4FFAR1CDK1
SCHEMBL3777574 0.78 PTGES2 (1.00) PTGES2LMNACA1CA2MEN1
SCHEMBL3486176 0.77 LMNA (0.80) LMNASMN1; SMN2MEN1KMT2ATDP1
SCHEMBL9908754 0.76 LMNA (0.65) PTGES2LMNASMN1; SMN2FFAR4FFAR1
SCHEMBL1450639 0.76 FFAR4 (0.57) LMNASMN1; SMN2FFAR4FFAR1CDK1
SCHEMBL3779817 0.76 CA2 (0.74) PTGES2LMNASMN1; SMN2CA1CA2
SCHEMBL23200380 0.75 KDM1A (0.79) LMNASMN1; SMN2FFAR4FFAR1CDK1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 11 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2234993-B1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2012-11-07 EP claimed
US-20100331321-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) derivatives for use in therapy ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2010-12-30 US claimed
EP-2234993-A1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY AstraZeneca AB (SE) 2010-10-06 EP claimed
WO-2009082347-A1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2009-07-02 WO claimed
US-20090163586-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) Derivatives in Therapy 205 ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2009-06-25 US claimed
US-9145380-B2 Bis-(sulfonylamino) derivatives for use in therapy ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2015-09-29 US disclosed
EP-2234993-B1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2012-11-07 EP disclosed
US-20100331321-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) derivatives for use in therapy ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2010-12-30 US disclosed
EP-2234993-A1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY AstraZeneca AB (SE) 2010-10-06 EP disclosed
WO-2009082347-A1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2009-07-02 WO disclosed
US-20090163586-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) Derivatives in Therapy 205 ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2009-06-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090163586-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) Derivatives in Therapy 205 PTGER1, SULT2A1, SULT1E1 PTGES2 30/4885LMNA 1118/4885SMN1; SMN2 1643/4885
US-20100331321-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) derivatives for use in therapy PTGER1, SULT2A1, SULT1E1 PTGES2 25/4885LMNA 1049/4885SMN1; SMN2 1765/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.