Bromide

Bromide

SCHEMBL4090613

Br.C=C(CCC)C(=O)O.CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCN(C)C

nearest known ligand 0.55

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ACHEADRA1AADRA1BADRA1DADRA2AADRA2BADRA2CADRB1ADRB2ADRB3APH1AAPH1BCHRM2CHRM3EZH2GRIN2AHTR1AHTR1BHTR1DHTR1FHTR3ANCSTNP2RY12PSEN1PSEN2PSENENSIGMAR1SLC6A2SLC6A3SLC6A4

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Bromide. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
DNM1 Q05193 6/20 0.55
THRB P10828 1/20 0.41
FNTA P49354 1/20 0.41
FNTB P49356 1/20 0.41
PGGT1B P53609 1/20 0.41
KDM4C Q9H3R0 7/20 0.40
KDM4A O75164 6/20 0.40
KDM5A P29375 2/20 0.40
PHF8 Q9UPP1 2/20 0.40
KDM7A Q6ZMT4 1/20 0.40
KDM2A Q9Y2K7 1/20 0.40
PPARG P37231 4/20 0.39
PPARD Q03181 4/20 0.39
PPARA Q07869 4/20 0.39
TSHR P16473 3/20 0.39
GPR84 Q9NQS5 3/20 0.39
HDAC11 Q96DB2 3/20 0.39
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.39
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.39
SLC22A6 Q4U2R8 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Bromide SCHEMBL307833 1.00 DNM1 (0.55) DNM1THRBFNTAFNTBPGGT1B
Bromide SCHEMBL16824527 1.00 DNM1 (0.55) DNM1THRBFNTAFNTBPGGT1B
Dymanthine SCHEMBL307460 1.00 DNM1 (0.55) DNM1THRBFNTAFNTBPGGT1B
SCHEMBL1476520 0.98 DNM1 (0.54) DNM1THRBFNTAFNTBPGGT1B
SCHEMBL16824248 0.98 DNM1 (0.54) DNM1THRBFNTAFNTBPGGT1B
SCHEMBL1478483 0.98 DNM1 (0.54) DNM1THRBFNTAFNTBPGGT1B
Dymanthine SCHEMBL1476823 0.98 DNM1 (0.54) DNM1THRBFNTAFNTBPGGT1B
SCHEMBL4931015 0.98 DNM1 (0.54) DNM1THRBFNTAFNTBPGGT1B
SCHEMBL1476849 0.91 DNM1 (0.42) DNM1THRBFNTAFNTBPGGT1B
Dymanthine SCHEMBL3148088 0.90 DNM1 (0.44) DNM1THRBFNTAFNTBPGGT1B

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 19 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9247736-B2 Antimicrobial adhesive films 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2016-02-02 US claimed
US-20240114905-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOSITIONS AND ARTICLES AND RELATED METHODS 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY 2024-04-11 US disclosed
EP-4284176-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOSITIONS AND ARTICLES AND RELATED METHODS 3M Innovative Properties Company (US) 2023-12-06 EP disclosed
WO-2022162614-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOSITIONS AND ARTICLES AND RELATED METHODS 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2022-08-04 WO disclosed
US-20220228005-A1 Aqueous-Based Release Coatings and Article Therefrom 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY 2022-07-21 US disclosed
EP-3990502-A1 AQUEOUS-BASED RELEASE COATINGS AND ARTICLES THEREFROM 3M Innovative Properties Company (US) 2022-05-04 EP disclosed
WO-2020261037-A1 AQUEOUS-BASED RELEASE COATINGS AND ARTICLES THEREFROM 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2020-12-30 WO disclosed
EP-3083862-B1 ANTIMICROBIAL PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE SYSTEM 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO (US) 2020-08-05 EP disclosed
US-20170007464-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE SYSTEM 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2017-01-12 US disclosed
US-20160310631-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL FIBROUS MATERIALS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2016-10-27 US disclosed
EP-3083862-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE SYSTEM 3M Innovative Properties Company (US) 2016-10-26 EP disclosed
EP-3016513-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL FOAMS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME 3M Innovative Properties Company (US) 2016-05-11 EP disclosed
US-20160120176-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL FOAMS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2016-05-05 US disclosed
US-9247736-B2 Antimicrobial adhesive films 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2016-02-02 US disclosed
WO-2015094786-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL FIBROUS MATERIALS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2015-06-25 WO disclosed
WO-2015095165-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE SYSTEM 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2015-06-25 WO disclosed
WO-2015002786-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL FOAMS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2015-01-08 WO disclosed
US-20090130157-A1 Antimicrobial Adhesive Films 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY 2009-05-21 US disclosed
WO-2007070650-A2 ANTIMICROBIAL ADHESIVE FILMS 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2007-06-21 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090130157-A1 Antimicrobial Adhesive Films ICAM1, EPCAM, CAPG DNM1 622/4885THRB 4437/4885FNTA 3407/4885
US-20160120176-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL FOAMS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME CUTA, ARG1, CD68 DNM1 628/4885THRB 4807/4885FNTA 4110/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.