SCHEMBL4368188

SCHEMBL4368188

CC(C)C(C(C)P(c1ccc(C(C)(C)C)cc1)c1ccc(C(C)(C)C)cc1)C(C)P(c1ccc(C(C)(C)C)cc1)c1ccc(C(C)(C)C)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.38

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.38
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.37
TYR P14679 1/20 0.37
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.34
GRIA4 P48058 3/20 0.33
KIF11 P52732 2/20 0.32
EPHX1 P07099 1/20 0.32
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.31
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.31
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.31
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.31
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.31
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.31
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.31
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.31
SLC22A2 O15244 1/20 0.31
SLC22A1 O15245 1/20 0.31
SLC22A3 O75751 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4378404 0.83 TSHR (0.41) TSHRLMNATYRTP53GRIA4
SCHEMBL4371679 0.77 TSHR (0.36) TSHRLMNATYRTP53GRIA4
SCHEMBL4380162 0.77 ACHE (0.36) MAPT
SCHEMBL4367995 0.75 EPHX1 (0.34) TSHRLMNATP53EPHX1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL4376395 0.75 TSHR (0.41) TSHRLMNATYRTP53GRIA4
SCHEMBL4372728 0.74 GRIA4 (0.38) TSHRLMNATYRTP53GRIA4
SCHEMBL4379627 0.74 TDP1 (0.38)
SCHEMBL16489774 0.73 TSHR (0.39) TSHRLMNATYRTP53GRIA4
SCHEMBL4373239 0.73 TSHR (0.39) TSHRLMNATYRTP53GRIA4
SCHEMBL16489817 0.73 TSHR (0.39) TSHRLMNATYRTP53GRIA4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1867654-B1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF OPTICALLY ACTIVE QUINUCLIDINOL NAGOYA IND SCIENCE RES INST (JP) 2014-06-11 EP disclosed
EP-2623509-A1 Method of producing an optically active amine compound by catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation using a ruthenium-diphosphine complex Kanto Kagaku Kabushiki Kaisha (JP) 2013-08-07 EP disclosed
US-20130197234-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING OPTICALLY ACTIVE AMINE COMPOUND NATIONAL UNIVERSITY CORPORATION HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY (JP) 2013-08-01 US disclosed
US-8212037-B2 Process for production of optically active quinuclidinols KANTO KAGAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA (JP) 2012-07-03 US disclosed
US-20090216019-A1 Process for Production of Optically Active Quinuclidinols KANTO KAGAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA 2009-08-27 US disclosed
EP-1867654-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF OPTICALLY ACTIVE QUINUCLIDINOL Nagoya Industrial Science Research Institute (JP) 2007-12-19 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090216019-A1 Process for Production of Optically Active Quinuclidinols NQO2, ADH7, MRPL21 TSHR 2723/4885LMNA 3915/4885TYR 31/4885
US-20130197234-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING OPTICALLY ACTIVE AMINE COMPOUND HRH3, TDO2, SRM TSHR 1977/4885LMNA 4608/4885TYR 47/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.