Methamphetamine

Methamphetamine

SCHEMBL4377970

CCOP(=O)(O)O.CNC(C)Cc1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.62

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

SLC6A2SLC6A3SLC6A4

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Methamphetamine. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SIGMAR1 Q99720 4/20 0.62
TAAR1 Q96RJ0 3/20 0.62
SLC18A2 Q05940 1/20 0.62
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.47
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.47
PIN1 Q13526 3/20 0.47
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.44
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.44
LAP3 P28838 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Methamphetamine SCHEMBL4377972 1.00 SIGMAR1 (0.62) SIGMAR1TAAR1SLC18A2NPC1RAB9A
Methamphetamine SCHEMBL4390313 0.86 TAAR1 (0.68) SIGMAR1TAAR1SLC18A2NPC1RAB9A
Methamphetamine SCHEMBL4390312 0.86 TAAR1 (0.68) SIGMAR1TAAR1SLC18A2NPC1RAB9A
Methamphetamine SCHEMBL28489401 0.86 TAAR1 (0.78) SIGMAR1TAAR1SLC18A2NPC1RAB9A
Amphetamine SCHEMBL4387791 0.82 SLC6A4 (0.59) SIGMAR1TAAR1PIN1LAP3
Methamphetamine SCHEMBL27438559 0.80 SIGMAR1 (0.95) SIGMAR1TAAR1SLC18A2NPC1RAB9A
Methamphetamine SCHEMBL28959450 0.79 SIGMAR1 (0.84) SIGMAR1TAAR1SLC18A2NPC1RAB9A
Methamphetamine SCHEMBL18985124 0.79 SIGMAR1 (0.84) SIGMAR1TAAR1SLC18A2NPC1RAB9A
Methamphetamine SCHEMBL18227057 0.79 SIGMAR1 (0.91) SIGMAR1TAAR1SLC18A2NPC1RAB9A
Methamphetamine SCHEMBL20211416 0.79 SIGMAR1 (1.00) SIGMAR1TAAR1SLC18A2NPC1RAB9A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2121029-A2 PRODRUGS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME Neurogesx, Inc. (US) 2009-11-25 EP disclosed
US-20080318905-A1 Prodrugs and methods of making and using the same NEUROGESX, INC. 2008-12-25 US disclosed
WO-2008070149-A2 PRODRUGS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME NEUROGESX, INC. (US) 2008-06-12 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080318905-A1 Prodrugs and methods of making and using the same NAPEPLD, CES2, MTAP SIGMAR1 173/4885TAAR1 497/4885SLC18A2 126/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.