SCHEMBL4710463

SCHEMBL4710463

O=S1(=O)c2cc(Br)c(Br)cc2Nc2cc(Br)c(Br)cc21

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.43
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.43
NOX1 Q9Y5S8 1/20 0.43
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.37
POLB P06746 1/20 0.37
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.37
MAOA P21397 1/20 0.33
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.32
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.32
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.32
CA4 P22748 1/20 0.32
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.32
CA9 Q16790 1/20 0.32
BCHE P06276 1/20 0.31
CES1 P23141 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL31348058 0.64 KMT2A (0.50) KMT2AMEN1NOX1KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL10278599 0.63 CA1 (0.53) KMT2AMEN1NOX1KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL4707719 0.60 NOX1 (0.43) KMT2AMEN1NOX1POLBMAPT
SCHEMBL20664932 0.60 KMT2A (0.46) KMT2AMEN1NOX1KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL22941400 0.58 GPR3 (0.38) KMT2AMEN1NOX1MAPT
SCHEMBL4708571 0.57
SCHEMBL356698 0.54 AHR (0.50) POLBMAPTCA1CA2CA4
SCHEMBL29697204 0.54 S100A4 (0.46) CA12CA1CA2CA4CA7
SCHEMBL29726026 0.54 S100A4 (0.46) CA12CA1CA2CA4CA7
SCHEMBL31602107 0.49 CHEK1 (0.53) CA12CA1CA2CA4CA7

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1765797-A4 PHENOTHIAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR METHOD OF USE UNIV KANSAS CT FOR RES INC (US) 2008-02-06 EP claimed
EP-1765797-A1 PHENOTHIAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR METHOD OF USE University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc. (US) 2007-03-28 EP claimed
WO-2006002441-A1 PHENOTHIAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR METHOD OF USE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS (US) 2006-01-05 WO claimed
US-20050288279-A1 Phenothiazine derivatives and their method of use KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF 2005-12-29 US claimed
EP-1765797-A4 PHENOTHIAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR METHOD OF USE UNIV KANSAS CT FOR RES INC (US) 2008-02-06 EP disclosed
EP-1765797-A1 PHENOTHIAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR METHOD OF USE University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc. (US) 2007-03-28 EP disclosed
WO-2006002441-A1 PHENOTHIAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR METHOD OF USE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS (US) 2006-01-05 WO disclosed
US-20050288279-A1 Phenothiazine derivatives and their method of use KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF 2005-12-29 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050288279-A1 Phenothiazine derivatives and their method of use SHBG, GPR119, BRDT KMT2A 1178/4885MEN1 2558/4885NOX1 3177/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.