SCHEMBL4767802

SCHEMBL4767802

O=C(NCc1ccc2c(c1)OCO2)c1ccc(NS(=O)(=O)CCc2ccccc2Cl)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.64

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.64
PKM P14618 3/20 0.64
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.64
LMNA P02545 5/20 0.59
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.59
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.59
ALDH1A1 P00352 5/20 0.56
ALDH2 P05091 1/20 0.56
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.54
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.54
HPGD P15428 3/20 0.54
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.54
NAMPT P43490 1/20 0.54
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.53
MMP13 P45452 1/20 0.53
GLA P06280 1/20 0.53

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4768044 0.83 HPGD (0.52) KMT2APKMMEN1USP2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL5571868 0.80 ALDH1A1 (0.58) KMT2APKMMEN1LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL4778580 0.79 SMN1; SMN2 (0.44) KMT2AMEN1LMNAMAPTHPGD
SCHEMBL4768011 0.78 ALDH1A1 (0.62) KMT2AMEN1LMNAALDH1A1TDP1
SCHEMBL4776613 0.78 HIF1A (0.50) LMNAMAPTHPGDNAMPT
SCHEMBL4775200 0.77 L3MBTL1 (0.47) LMNAMAPTALDH1A1TDP1HPGD
SCHEMBL4767807 0.77 NPSR1 (0.74) KMT2APKMMEN1LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL4772410 0.77 HIF1A (0.55) KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1HPGDNAMPT
SCHEMBL4791474 0.76 ALDH1A1 (0.61) KMT2APKMMEN1LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL4768151 0.76 MAPT (0.49) KMT2AMEN1MAPTALDH1A1TDP1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1942888-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Inc. (US) 2008-07-16 EP claimed
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2007-06-14 US claimed
WO-2007056078-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2007-05-18 WO claimed
EP-1942888-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Inc. (US) 2008-07-16 EP disclosed
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2007-06-14 US disclosed
WO-2007056078-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2007-05-18 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods KIF5B, KIF2C, PLK1 KMT2A 1501/4885PKM 932/4885MEN1 1302/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.