SCHEMBL4773377

SCHEMBL4773377

COC(=O)c1cc(-c2ccc(NS(=O)(=O)CCc3cccc(Cl)c3Cl)cc2)oc1C

nearest known ligand 0.40

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
EDNRA P25101 1/20 0.39
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.39
GAA P10253 1/20 0.39
ALDH1A1 P00352 6/20 0.38
HPGD P15428 4/20 0.38
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.38
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.38
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.38
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.37
RORC P51449 1/20 0.37
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.36
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.36
CYP1A2 P05177 3/20 0.35
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.35
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.35
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.35
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.35
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.35
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.35
ALOX12 P18054 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4773380 0.79 LMNA (0.42) LMNAGAAALDH1A1HPGDMAPT
SCHEMBL4771005 0.77 POLB (0.55) LMNAALDH1A1HPGDMAPTNPC1
SCHEMBL4777535 0.75 PTGES2 (0.49) LMNAGAAALDH1A1HPGDMAPT
SCHEMBL4774741 0.73 HPGD (0.58) LMNAALDH1A1HPGDMAPTNPC1
SCHEMBL4776450 0.72 STAT3 (0.44) LMNAHPGDMAPTNPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL4767769 0.72 MAPT (0.45) LMNAALDH1A1HPGDMAPTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL4767669 0.72 MAPT (0.46) LMNAALDH1A1HPGDMAPTNPC1
SCHEMBL3914366 0.71 NPC1 (0.70) LMNAGAAALDH1A1HPGDMAPT
SCHEMBL4774787 0.71 HPGD (0.47) ALDH1A1HPGDMAPTKMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL4769626 0.70 SMN1; SMN2 (0.41) LMNAGAAALDH1A1HPGDMAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1942888-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Inc. (US) 2008-07-16 EP claimed
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2007-06-14 US claimed
WO-2007056078-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2007-05-18 WO claimed
EP-1942888-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Inc. (US) 2008-07-16 EP disclosed
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2007-06-14 US disclosed
WO-2007056078-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2007-05-18 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods KIF5B, KIF2C, PLK1 EDNRA 4186/4885LMNA 1022/4885GAA 466/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.