SCHEMBL4777535

SCHEMBL4777535

COC(=O)c1ccccc1NS(=O)(=O)CCc1cccc(Cl)c1Cl

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PTGES2 Q9H7Z7 4/20 0.49
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.46
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.46
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.45
ALDH1A1 P00352 5/20 0.45
KDM4E B2RXH2 5/20 0.45
RCE1 Q9Y256 1/20 0.45
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.44
PTGS2 P35354 1/20 0.44
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.43
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.43
POLB P06746 1/20 0.43
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.43
MAPK8 P45983 1/20 0.42
MAPK9 P45984 1/20 0.42
MAPK10 P53779 1/20 0.42
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.41
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.41
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.41
GLA P06280 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4767669 0.83 MAPT (0.46) PTGES2LMNATSHRALDH1A1KDM4E
SCHEMBL4767769 0.81 MAPT (0.45) PTGES2LMNATSHRALDH1A1KDM4E
SCHEMBL4771005 0.79 POLB (0.55) LMNAALDH1A1MAPTHPGDKMT2A
SCHEMBL1866704 0.75 KCNA5 (0.47) LMNAMAPK1TSHRALDH1A1KDM4E
SCHEMBL16569786 0.75 KDM4E (0.66) LMNAMAPK1TSHRALDH1A1KDM4E
SCHEMBL25219425 0.75 CYP1A2 (0.56) TSHRALDH1A1KDM4EMAPTHPGD
SCHEMBL4773377 0.75 EDNRA (0.39) PTGES2LMNAALDH1A1KDM4EMAPT
SCHEMBL2212212 0.74 TSHR (0.58) LMNAMAPK1TSHRALDH1A1KDM4E
SCHEMBL4771118 0.74 SMN1; SMN2 (0.46) LMNAALDH1A1MAPTHPGDKMT2A
SCHEMBL31518611 0.73 TSHR (0.57) LMNAMAPK1TSHRALDH1A1KDM4E

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1942888-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Inc. (US) 2008-07-16 EP claimed
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2007-06-14 US claimed
WO-2007056078-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2007-05-18 WO claimed
EP-1942888-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Inc. (US) 2008-07-16 EP disclosed
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2007-06-14 US disclosed
WO-2007056078-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2007-05-18 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods KIF5B, KIF2C, PLK1 PTGES2 4324/4885LMNA 1022/4885MAPK1 2283/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.