SCHEMBL4832258

SCHEMBL4832258

CNCc1cc(F)nc(F)c1

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.39
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.39
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.39
PRMT6 Q96LA8 3/20 0.36
LOXL2 Q9Y4K0 1/20 0.35
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.35
GAA P10253 1/20 0.35
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.35
EPHX2 P34913 1/20 0.34
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.33
NOS1 P29475 4/20 0.33
NOS3 P29474 2/20 0.33
PARP1 P09874 1/20 0.33
ADRB2 P07550 1/20 0.32
NCF1 P14598 1/20 0.31
TAAR1 Q96RJ0 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4835923 0.86 KDM4E (0.33) KDM4ECYP3A4MAPTPRMT6LOXL2
SCHEMBL13339967 0.76 KDM4E (0.52) KDM4ECYP3A4MAPTPRMT6LOXL2
SCHEMBL3350251 0.75 KDM4E (0.42) KDM4ECYP3A4MAPTPRMT6LOXL2
SCHEMBL12536053 0.74 LOXL2 (0.57) KDM4ECYP3A4MAPTPRMT6LOXL2
SCHEMBL7660025 0.73 KDM4E (0.41) KDM4ECYP3A4MAPTPRMT6LOXL2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6255483 0.73 KDM4E (0.46) KDM4ECYP3A4MAPTPRMT6LOXL2
SCHEMBL14451961 0.73 KDM4E (0.41) KDM4ECYP3A4MAPTPRMT6LOXL2
SCHEMBL9971004 0.72 PTGS2 (0.36) LOXL2LMNAGAAL3MBTL1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL4826584 0.71 KDM4E (0.39) KDM4ECYP3A4MAPTPRMT6LOXL2
SCHEMBL4826581 0.71 NOS3 (0.33) KDM4ELMNAGAAL3MBTL1NOS1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7442692-B2 Indanyl-piperazine compounds LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2008-10-28 US disclosed
WO-2006103342-A9 INDANYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME SERVIER LAB (FR) 2007-10-25 WO disclosed
EP-1707564-B1 Indanyl-piperazine derivatives, process for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them SERVIER LAB (FR) 2007-09-12 EP disclosed
US-20060223830-A1 Indanyl-piperazine compounds LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2006-10-05 US disclosed
WO-2006103342-A2 INDANYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2006-10-05 WO disclosed
EP-1707564-A2 Indanyl-piperazine derivatives, process for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them Les Laboratoires Servier (FR) 2006-10-04 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060223830-A1 Indanyl-piperazine compounds HTR4, NR4A1, NR4A3 KDM4E 1559/4885CYP3A4 40/4885MAPT 3623/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.