SCHEMBL4837374

SCHEMBL4837374

CNCc1cc(F)cc(Cl)n1

nearest known ligand 0.37

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.37
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.37
SLC6A4 P31645 14/20 0.33
HTR2A P28223 13/20 0.33
HTR2C P28335 9/20 0.33
KCNH2 Q12809 6/20 0.33
SLC6A2 P23975 1/20 0.33
SLC6A3 Q01959 1/20 0.33
MAPK13 O15264 1/20 0.33
CSNK1D P48730 1/20 0.33
CSNK1E P49674 1/20 0.33
MAPK12 P53778 1/20 0.33
MAPK11 Q15759 1/20 0.33
MAPK14 Q16539 1/20 0.33
NOS3 P29474 2/20 0.32
NOS1 P29475 2/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4835449 0.80 KDM4E (0.42) KDM4ETP53SLC6A4HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL4826581 0.80 NOS3 (0.33) KDM4ETP53SLC6A4HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL4826754 0.73 KDM4E (0.40) KDM4ETP53SLC6A4HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL28783722 0.71
SCHEMBL4835923 0.69 KDM4E (0.33) KDM4ETP53SLC6A4HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL4826584 0.69 KDM4E (0.39) KDM4ETP53SLC6A4HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL31509817 0.68 CDK2 (0.40) KDM4ETP53HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL8340318 0.68 KDM4E (0.42) KDM4ETP53SLC6A4HTR2CSLC6A2
SCHEMBL31285751 0.66
SCHEMBL16579755 0.66

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7442692-B2 Indanyl-piperazine compounds LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2008-10-28 US disclosed
WO-2006103342-A9 INDANYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME SERVIER LAB (FR) 2007-10-25 WO disclosed
EP-1707564-B1 Indanyl-piperazine derivatives, process for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them SERVIER LAB (FR) 2007-09-12 EP disclosed
US-20060223830-A1 Indanyl-piperazine compounds LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2006-10-05 US disclosed
WO-2006103342-A2 INDANYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2006-10-05 WO disclosed
EP-1707564-A2 Indanyl-piperazine derivatives, process for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them Les Laboratoires Servier (FR) 2006-10-04 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060223830-A1 Indanyl-piperazine compounds HTR4, NR4A1, NR4A3 KDM4E 1559/4885TP53 3984/4885SLC6A4 27/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.