SCHEMBL5653130

SCHEMBL5653130

Cc1ccc(S(=O)(=O)C2CCC(S(=O)(=O)c3ccc(C)cc3)CCN(CCN)CC2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTR2A P28223 12/20 0.51
KCNH2 Q12809 9/20 0.51
HTR2C P28335 9/20 0.51
DRD2 P14416 6/20 0.46
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.46
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.46
CA12 O43570 2/20 0.44
CA1 P00915 2/20 0.44
CA2 P00918 2/20 0.44
CA4 P22748 2/20 0.44
CA5A P35218 2/20 0.44
CA7 P43166 2/20 0.44
CA9 Q16790 2/20 0.44
CA13 Q8N1Q1 2/20 0.44
CA14 Q9ULX7 2/20 0.44
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.41
MBTD1 Q05BQ5 1/20 0.41
PRMT3 O60678 1/20 0.39
CARM1 Q86X55 1/20 0.39
PRMT6 Q96LA8 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5512253 0.92 HTR2A (0.53) HTR2AKCNH2HTR2CDRD2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL5513049 0.86 HTR2A (0.51) HTR2AKCNH2HTR2CDRD2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL14538284 0.84 HTR2A (0.52) HTR2AKCNH2HTR2CDRD2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL5509619 0.83 HTR2A (0.53) HTR2AKCNH2HTR2CDRD2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL23423396 0.82 HTR2A (0.51) HTR2AKCNH2HTR2CDRD2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL14501613 0.80 HTR2A (0.58) HTR2AKCNH2HTR2CALDH1A1
SCHEMBL5761130 0.79 GAA (0.52) ALDH1A1CA12CA1CA2CA5A
SCHEMBL7923378 0.78 ALDH1A1 (0.46) HTR2AKCNH2HTR2CDRD2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL23374789 0.78 NAMPT (0.54) HTR2AKCNH2HTR2CDRD2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL7022479 0.78 HTR2A (0.63) HTR2AKCNH2HTR2CDRD2CA12

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1511476-B1 NOTA-LIKE MACROCYCLIC LIGANDS, COMPLEXES AND COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, AND METHODS OF USING SAME US GOV HEALTH & HUMAN SERV (US) 2012-11-07 EP disclosed
US-7081452-B2 Scorpionate-like pendant macrocyclic ligands, complexes and compositions thereof, and methods of using same THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (US) 2006-07-25 US disclosed
US-20030228262-A1 Scorpionate-like pendant macrocyclic ligands, complexes and compositions thereof, and methods of using same THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2003-12-11 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030228262-A1 Scorpionate-like pendant macrocyclic ligands, complexes and compositions thereof, and methods of using same CXCR3, CCR5, TAC3 HTR2A 3134/4885KCNH2 1448/4885HTR2C 2479/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.