SCHEMBL6080200

SCHEMBL6080200

O=C(O)c1cc(O)c2cc(-c3cc(Cl)cc(Cl)c3)cc(O)c2n1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GPR35 Q9HC97 3/20 0.42
KMO O15229 1/20 0.42
RXRA P19793 2/20 0.40
RXRB P28702 2/20 0.40
MCL1 Q07820 1/20 0.37
RHEB Q15382 1/20 0.36
IGFBP3 P17936 2/20 0.36
TPMT P51580 1/20 0.35
CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.35
CNR2 P34972 1/20 0.35
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.34
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.34
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.34
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.34
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.34
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.34
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.34
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6079979 0.88 MCL1 (0.50) GPR35KMORXRARXRBMCL1
SCHEMBL6079784 0.88 KMO (0.46) GPR35KMORXRARXRBCNR2
SCHEMBL6080080 0.83 MCL1 (0.46) KMOMCL1KDM4EKMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL6080194 0.83 KMO (0.51) GPR35KMOIGFBP3KDM4EKMT2A
SCHEMBL6080570 0.79 SCN9A (0.43) MCL1IGFBP3KDM4E
SCHEMBL6080533 0.79 IGFBP3 (0.43) GPR35IGFBP3KDM4EKMT2A
SCHEMBL2901884 0.78 GPR35 (0.44) GPR35KMOIGFBP3ALOX15TSHR
SCHEMBL6080671 0.77 GPR35 (0.43) GPR35IGFBP3ALOX15TSHRHIF1A
SCHEMBL6080980 0.76 L3MBTL1 (0.53) GPR35KMOKDM4ERAB9A
SCHEMBL6080018 0.76 KMO (0.46) GPR35KMOCNR1CNR2KDM4E

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NEURO3D (FR) 2006-08-17 US claimed
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NEURO3D (FR) 2006-08-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NQO1, NQO2, RECQL GPR35 1071/4885KMO 91/4885RXRA 4509/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.