SCHEMBL6080914

SCHEMBL6080914

Cc1c(C(=O)O)nc2c(O)cc(-c3cccnc3)cc2c1O

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.52
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.49
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.49
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.49
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.46
HTT P42858 1/20 0.46
KMO O15229 1/20 0.43
MKNK1 Q9BUB5 3/20 0.42
MKNK2 Q9HBH9 3/20 0.42
GPR35 Q9HC97 2/20 0.41
DHODH Q02127 3/20 0.41
CYP19A1 P11511 1/20 0.40
PIM1 P11309 1/20 0.39
PIM2 Q9P1W9 1/20 0.39
DYRK1A Q13627 1/20 0.39
ERN1 O75460 2/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6081551 0.83 AKR1C2 (0.46) KMODHODH
SCHEMBL6080629 0.81 CYP11B1 (0.47) L3MBTL1LMNACYP19A1
SCHEMBL6079346 0.79 DHODH (0.44) KDM4ENPC1RAB9ADHODH
SCHEMBL6080980 0.78 L3MBTL1 (0.53) L3MBTL1KDM4ENPC1RAB9ALMNA
SCHEMBL6080393 0.77 KMO (0.47) KMODHODH
SCHEMBL6080593 0.77 PRKAG1 (0.48) KDM4ENPC1RAB9ADHODHDYRK1A
SCHEMBL6080431 0.75 DHODH (0.40) KDM4ELMNAHTTDHODH
SCHEMBL6081306 0.73 PDE10A (0.45) KDM4EGPR35DHODHERN1
SCHEMBL6080119 0.72 DHODH (0.39) KDM4ENPC1RAB9ALMNAHTT
SCHEMBL6079550 0.72 PIN1 (0.41) KDM4ELMNADHODH

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NEURO3D (FR) 2006-08-17 US claimed
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NEURO3D (FR) 2006-08-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NQO1, NQO2, RECQL L3MBTL1 4069/4885KDM4E 1006/4885NPC1 1911/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.