SCHEMBL6081160

SCHEMBL6081160

COC(=O)c1cc(OC(=O)c2cc(O)c3cc(CNCc4ccccc4)cc(O)c3n2)c2cc(CNCc3ccccc3)cc(OC)c2n1

nearest known ligand 0.39

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PIM1 P11309 1/20 0.38
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.38
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.37
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.37
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.37
GAA P10253 2/20 0.37
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.37
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.36
TRPV1 Q8NER1 1/20 0.36
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.36
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.36
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.36
CHEK1 O14757 2/20 0.35
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.35
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.35
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.35
HTT P42858 1/20 0.35
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6080173 0.91 KDM4E (0.44) PIM1KDM4EALDH1A1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6597613 0.84 ALOX15 (0.45) PIM1KDM4EALDH1A1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6080649 0.81 ALOX5 (0.47) KDM4EALDH1A1KMT2ATRPV1
SCHEMBL6081161 0.79 PIM1 (0.41) PIM1KDM4EALDH1A1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6080822 0.78 RNASEH1 (0.44) KDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6080032 0.77 KDM4E (0.41) KDM4EALOX15CYP2D6CYP2C19
SCHEMBL6080683 0.73 NPC1 (0.40) PIM1ALDH1A1CYP3A4RAB9ACYP2C9
SCHEMBL6081303 0.73 DHODH (0.43) KDM4EALDH1A1ALOX15SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6593629 0.72 ALOX5 (0.49) PIM1KDM4EGAATRPV1ALOX15
SCHEMBL6080125 0.72 LMNA (0.47) ALDH1A1TSHR

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NEURO3D (FR) 2006-08-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NQO1, NQO2, RECQL PIM1 3960/4885KDM4E 1006/4885ALDH1A1 2726/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.