Cyclohexylamine

Cyclohexylamine

SCHEMBL6137317

Cc1cc(CCCC(CC(=O)OC(C)(C)C)C(=O)O)ccc1-c1ccccc1.NC1CCCCC1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MMP2 P08253 14/20 0.46
MMP3 P08254 9/20 0.46
MMP9 P14780 5/20 0.45
MMP14 P50281 5/20 0.45
MMP13 P45452 3/20 0.45
MMP1 P03956 5/20 0.43
BMP1 P13497 1/20 0.43
PPARG P37231 5/20 0.37
PPARA Q07869 3/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Cyclohexylamine SCHEMBL6137314 1.00 MMP2 (0.46) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP14MMP13
SCHEMBL6137313 0.90 MMP2 (0.53) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP14MMP13
SCHEMBL6137316 0.90 MMP2 (0.53) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP14MMP13
Cyclohexylamine SCHEMBL5408739 0.86 MMP2 (0.46) MMP2MMP3MMP1PPARG
Cyclohexylamine SCHEMBL5408733 0.86 MMP2 (0.46) MMP2MMP3MMP1PPARG
SCHEMBL6137315 0.84 MMP2 (0.46) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP14MMP13
Cyclohexylamine SCHEMBL6137474 0.78 PPARG (0.37) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP14MMP13
Cyclohexylamine SCHEMBL6137479 0.78 PPARG (0.37) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP14MMP13
SCHEMBL5400156 0.74 GRIK1 (0.54) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP14MMP1
SCHEMBL5400150 0.74 GRIK1 (0.54) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP14MMP1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1199301-B1 Olefination process to itaconate and succinate derivatives PFIZER LTD (GB) 2005-06-08 EP disclosed
US-6750363-B2 Olefination process to itaconate and succinate derivatives PFIZER, INC. 2004-06-15 US disclosed
US-20020188121-A1 Novel olefination process to itaconate and succinate derivatives DERRICK ANDREW MICHAEL (GB) 2002-12-12 US disclosed
US-6452041-B1 REACTING ALDEHYDE OF FORMULA RCHO, OR A PROTECTED DERIVATIVE THEREOF SUCH AS A HEMIACETAL OR ADDUCT THEREOF SUCH AS A BISULPHITE, WITH A PHOSPHORUS COMPOUND TO OBTAIN SUCCINATE OR ITACONATE DERIVATIVE PFIZER INC. 2002-09-17 US disclosed
US-20020058832-A1 Novel olefination process to itaconate and succinate derivatives PFIZER INC. 2002-05-16 US disclosed
EP-1199301-A1 Olefination process to itaconate and succinate derivatives Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-04-24 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020188121-A1 Novel olefination process to itaconate and succinate derivatives HOGA1, OGDH, HADHA MMP2 3089/4885MMP3 3048/4885MMP9 3859/4885
US-20020058832-A1 Novel olefination process to itaconate and succinate derivatives HOGA1, HADHA, OGDH MMP2 2827/4885MMP3 3007/4885MMP9 3662/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.