SCHEMBL6138439

SCHEMBL6138439

CCCN(CCC)Cc1ccc(-c2ccc([C@H](O)CCCCC(=O)NOC(C)(C)OC)cc2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.41

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HRH3 Q9Y5N1 4/20 0.40
PTGER2 P43116 5/20 0.34
RORC P51449 3/20 0.34
TRPV1 Q8NER1 1/20 0.32
ASAH1 Q13510 1/20 0.32
PTGER4 P35408 2/20 0.32
PTGER3 P43115 2/20 0.32
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.32
HDAC3 O15379 1/20 0.32
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.32
HDAC2 Q92769 1/20 0.32
HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.32
NCOR2 Q9Y618 1/20 0.32
PPARA Q07869 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6138465 0.88 HDAC1 (0.35) HRH3PTGER2HDAC3HDAC1HDAC2
SCHEMBL6770699 0.84 HRH3 (0.40) HRH3RORCPPARA
SCHEMBL6138871 0.82 HRH3 (0.49) HRH3RORCHDAC3HDAC1HDAC2
SCHEMBL6138877 0.82 HRH3 (0.49) HRH3RORCHDAC3HDAC1HDAC2
SCHEMBL6138502 0.81 GAA (0.39) PTGER2HDAC3HDAC1HDAC2HDAC8
SCHEMBL6138387 0.80 MMP13 (0.36) PTGER2ASAH1PTGER4PTGER3HDAC1
SCHEMBL6138716 0.78 HDAC1 (0.38) PTGER2ASAH1PTGER4PTGER3HDAC3
SCHEMBL6138755 0.77 AOC3 (0.42) HRH3
SCHEMBL6138879 0.75 AVPR1B (0.38)
SCHEMBL6138784 0.73 ACACB (0.41) PTGER2PTGER4PTGER3HDAC1HDAC8

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1215203-B1 HYDROXAMIC ACID DERIVATIVES, PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF AND DRUGS CONTAINING THE SAME AS THE ACTIVE INGREDIENT ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO (JP) 2005-02-16 EP claimed
US-20040214896-A1 Hydroxamic acid derivatives, the methods for preparation thereof and pharmaceutical compositions comprising thereof, as an active ingredient ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2004-10-28 US claimed
EP-1215203-A1 HYDROXAMIC ACID DERIVATIVES, PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF AND DRUGS CONTAINING THE SAME AS THE ACTIVE INGREDIENT ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) 2002-06-19 EP claimed
EP-1215203-B1 HYDROXAMIC ACID DERIVATIVES, PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF AND DRUGS CONTAINING THE SAME AS THE ACTIVE INGREDIENT ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO (JP) 2005-02-16 EP disclosed
US-20040214896-A1 Hydroxamic acid derivatives, the methods for preparation thereof and pharmaceutical compositions comprising thereof, as an active ingredient ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2004-10-28 US disclosed
EP-1215203-A1 HYDROXAMIC ACID DERIVATIVES, PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF AND DRUGS CONTAINING THE SAME AS THE ACTIVE INGREDIENT ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) 2002-06-19 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040214896-A1 Hydroxamic acid derivatives, the methods for preparation thereof and pharmaceutical compositions comprising thereof, as an active ingredient HIF1AN, IL6, PYGM HRH3 3134/4885PTGER2 2464/4885RORC 495/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.