SCHEMBL6220462

SCHEMBL6220462

Cc1ccc(S(=O)(=O)c2ccc3c(c2)[C@@H]2CCN(C)CCC2N3)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 6)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ HTR2A P28223 1/20 0.42
▸ HTR2C P28335 1/20 0.42
▸ HTR6 P50406 12/20 0.41
▸ CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.40
▸ GAA P10253 1/20 0.38
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6202141 1.00 HTR2A (0.42) HTR2AHTR2CHTR6CYP2D6GAA
SCHEMBL6217043 1.00 HTR2A (0.42) HTR2AHTR2CHTR6CYP2D6GAA
SCHEMBL6198240 1.00 HTR2A (0.42) HTR2AHTR2CHTR6CYP2D6GAA
SCHEMBL6197664 1.00 HTR2A (0.42) HTR2AHTR2CHTR6CYP2D6GAA
SCHEMBL6201312 1.00 HTR2A (0.42) HTR2AHTR2CHTR6CYP2D6GAA
SCHEMBL6201184 0.91 HTR6 (0.51) HTR2AHTR2CHTR6LMNA
SCHEMBL6200066 0.91 HTR6 (0.51) HTR2AHTR2CHTR6LMNA
SCHEMBL6220778 0.91 HTR6 (0.51) HTR2AHTR2CHTR6LMNA
SCHEMBL6201915 0.91 HTR6 (0.51) HTR2AHTR2CHTR6LMNA
SCHEMBL6200709 0.91 HTR6 (0.51) HTR2AHTR2CHTR6LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1351961-B1 SUBSTITUTED INDOLINES AS 5-HT RECEPTOR LIGANDS PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC (US) 2005-07-27 — — EP claimed
EP-1351961-A1 SUBSTITUTED INDOLINES AS 5-HT RECEPTOR LIGANDS PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 2003-10-15 — — EP claimed
US-20020160999-A1 Substituted indolines PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY 2002-10-31 — — US claimed
WO-2002060903-A1 SUBSTITUTED INDOLINES AS 5-HT RECEPTOR LIGANDS PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 2002-08-08 — — WO claimed
EP-1351961-B1 SUBSTITUTED INDOLINES AS 5-HT RECEPTOR LIGANDS PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC (US) 2005-07-27 — — EP disclosed
EP-1351961-A1 SUBSTITUTED INDOLINES AS 5-HT RECEPTOR LIGANDS PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 2003-10-15 — — EP disclosed
US-20020160999-A1 Substituted indolines PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY 2002-10-31 — — US disclosed
WO-2002060903-A1 SUBSTITUTED INDOLINES AS 5-HT RECEPTOR LIGANDS PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 2002-08-08 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020160999-A1 Substituted indolines TPH1, TPH2, NLN HTR2A 24/4885HTR2C 25/4885HTR6 16/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback