SCHEMBL6341024

SCHEMBL6341024

CCOC(=O)N/N=C(/Cc1ccc(C(F)(F)F)cc1)c1ccc(Cl)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.47
CNR2 P34972 1/20 0.45
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.43
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.42
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.42
GAA P10253 1/20 0.42
EPHX2 P34913 1/20 0.42
PPARG P37231 1/20 0.42
UTS2R Q9UKP6 1/20 0.41
KCNQ3 O43525 1/20 0.41
KCNQ2 O43526 1/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.40
THRB P10828 1/20 0.40
RHOC P08134 1/20 0.40
RHOA P61586 1/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.40
CETP P11597 1/20 0.40
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6341025 1.00 SMN1; SMN2 (0.47) SMN1; SMN2CNR2ATMMAPTALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6903409 0.86 CNR2 (0.50) SMN1; SMN2CNR2MAPTALDH1A1KDM4E
SCHEMBL9419902 0.80 CNR1 (0.57) CNR2MAPTALDH1A1EPHX2KMT2A
SCHEMBL9419871 0.79 MAPT (0.52) SMN1; SMN2MAPTALDH1A1KDM4EGAA
SCHEMBL9419873 0.79 MAPT (0.52) SMN1; SMN2MAPTALDH1A1KDM4EGAA
SCHEMBL260379 0.78 SMN1; SMN2 (0.55) SMN1; SMN2ATMMAPTALDH1A1KMT2A
SCHEMBL260380 0.78 SMN1; SMN2 (0.55) SMN1; SMN2ATMMAPTALDH1A1KMT2A
SCHEMBL8682896 0.73 LMNA (0.60) SMN1; SMN2MAPTALDH1A1KDM4EGAA
SCHEMBL8395979 0.72 SMN1; SMN2 (0.48) SMN1; SMN2ATMMAPTEPHX2KMT2A
SCHEMBL9804687 0.72 SMN1; SMN2 (0.54) SMN1; SMN2ATMMAPTALDH1A1KDM4E

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050215597-A1 Composition for controlling house insect pest and method for controlling house insect pest ISHIHARA SANGYO KAISHA, LTD (JP) 2005-09-29 US claimed
EP-0500111-A2 Hydrazone compounds, processes for their production, intermediates useful for their production and pesticidal compositions containing them ISHIHARA SANGYO KAISHA, LTD. (JP) 1992-08-26 EP claimed
US-5288727-A Hydrazone compounds, processes for their production, intermediates useful for their production and pesticidal compositions containing them ISHIHARA SANGYO KAISHA LTD. (JP) 1994-02-22 US disclosed
EP-0500111-A2 Hydrazone compounds, processes for their production, intermediates useful for their production and pesticidal compositions containing them ISHIHARA SANGYO KAISHA, LTD. (JP) 1992-08-26 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050215597-A1 Composition for controlling house insect pest and method for controlling house insect pest DDT, PHB1, ACHE SMN1; SMN2 2960/4885CNR2 615/4885ATM 3433/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.