SCHEMBL6432552

SCHEMBL6432552

CN(C)CCNC(=O)[C@H]1CCCN1S(=O)(=O)c1ccc2c(N(Cl)C(=N)N)cncc2c1

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.43
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.43
BDKRB2 P30411 9/20 0.42
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.40
FKBP1A P62942 2/20 0.40
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.39
CASP1 P29466 1/20 0.39
CASP7 P55210 1/20 0.39
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.39
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7412033 1.00 LMNA (0.43) LMNAHPGDBDKRB2KDM4EFKBP1A
SCHEMBL6434803 0.91 LMNA (0.44) LMNAHPGDKDM4EFKBP1ATP53
SCHEMBL6450526 0.85 CCR4 (0.39) LMNAKDM4E
SCHEMBL7380961 0.85 PLAU (0.52) LMNAKDM4EHSD17B10
SCHEMBL7365360 0.84 PLAU (0.52) LMNAKDM4EHSD17B10
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7368606 0.84 PLAU (0.51) LMNAKDM4EHSD17B10
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7366138 0.84 PLAU (0.51) LMNAKDM4EHSD17B10
SCHEMBL7370376 0.82 PLAU (0.53) KDM4EHSD17B10
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7369167 0.81 PLAU (0.52) KDM4EHSD17B10
SCHEMBL6434558 0.81 CASP3 (0.51)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 LMNA 1451/4885HPGD 913/4885BDKRB2 906/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 LMNA 1451/4885HPGD 913/4885BDKRB2 906/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.