SCHEMBL6433879

SCHEMBL6433879

Cc1cc(C2CCN(S(=O)(=O)C3(C(N)=O)CCOCC3)CC2)ccc1-c1cccc(OCCN)n1

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MMP2 P08253 10/20 0.55
MMP3 P08254 7/20 0.55
MMP9 P14780 3/20 0.55
MMP1 P03956 2/20 0.55
MMP14 P50281 2/20 0.55
MMP13 P45452 3/20 0.32
PDE10A Q9Y233 1/20 0.32
FFAR4 Q5NUL3 2/20 0.31
GLP1R P43220 4/20 0.31
CYP2C8 P10632 1/20 0.31
HTR2A P28223 1/20 0.31
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.31
TMEM97 Q5BJF2 1/20 0.31
GPR84 Q9NQS5 1/20 0.31
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6434664 0.99 MMP2 (0.54) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP1MMP14
SCHEMBL6439579 0.94 MMP2 (0.62) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP1MMP14
SCHEMBL6967923 0.92 MMP2 (0.58) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP1MMP14
SCHEMBL6434274 0.88 MMP2 (0.51) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP1MMP14
SCHEMBL6436812 0.88 MMP2 (0.51) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP1MMP14
SCHEMBL6435284 0.87 MMP2 (0.63) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP1MMP14
SCHEMBL6433286 0.86 MMP2 (0.64) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP1MMP14
SCHEMBL6434330 0.86 MMP2 (0.63) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP1MMP14
SCHEMBL7062407 0.85 MMP2 (0.59) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP1MMP14
SCHEMBL6964593 0.85 MMP2 (0.67) MMP2MMP3MMP9MMP1MMP14

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1181017-B1 METALLOPROTEASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LTD (GB) 2003-04-16 EP claimed
US-6511993-B1 Substituted alpha-aminosulphonyl-acetohydroxamic acids which are inhibitors of zinc-dependent metalloprotease enzymes PFIZER INC. 2003-01-28 US claimed
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 MMP2 19/4885MMP3 28/4885MMP9 44/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 MMP2 19/4885MMP3 28/4885MMP9 44/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.