SCHEMBL6436458

SCHEMBL6436458

N=C(N)N(Cl)c1cncc2cc(S(=O)(=O)Nc3ccccc3C(=O)O)ccc12

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLG P00747 1/20 0.52
PLAU P00749 1/20 0.52
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.47
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.47
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.47
POLB P06746 2/20 0.47
SLC25A1 P53007 1/20 0.47
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.47
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.44
HSD17B10 Q99714 2/20 0.44
SLC16A3 O15427 1/20 0.44
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.42
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.42
GAA P10253 2/20 0.42
ACLY P53396 2/20 0.41
WDR5 P61964 1/20 0.41
PMM2 O15305 1/20 0.40
HCRTR1 O43613 1/20 0.40
G6PD P11413 1/20 0.40
PKM P14618 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6433178 0.99 PLG (0.51) PLGPLAUMEN1KMT2AKDM4E
SCHEMBL7050659 0.87 LMNA (0.41) PLGPLAUMEN1KMT2AKDM4E
SCHEMBL6435599 0.82 PLG (0.52) PLGPLAUMEN1KMT2APOLB
SCHEMBL7383159 0.80 PLG (0.55) PLGPLAUMEN1KMT2AKDM4E
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7370328 0.80 ALDH1A1 (0.44) MEN1KMT2APOLBALDH1A1SLC16A3
SCHEMBL7387489 0.80 PDE4B (0.36)
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7377310 0.79 PLG (0.54) PLGPLAUMEN1KMT2AKDM4E
SCHEMBL7373625 0.79 MEN1 (0.31) PLAUMEN1KMT2A
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6436929 0.78 PLG (0.48) PLGPLAUMEN1KMT2APOLB
SCHEMBL6434174 0.78 PLAU (0.50) PLGPLAUSLC16A3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLG 33/4885PLAU 119/4885MEN1 4591/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLG 33/4885PLAU 119/4885MEN1 4591/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.