SCHEMBL6437559

SCHEMBL6437559

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)CC(NC(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c2c1)C(=O)OC(C)(C)C

nearest known ligand 0.39

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ROCK2 O75116 2/20 0.38
TAS1R3 Q7RTX0 2/20 0.36
TAS1R1 Q7RTX1 2/20 0.36
MAPT P10636 5/20 0.36
TDP1 Q9NUW8 4/20 0.36
GAA P10253 1/20 0.36
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.36
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.36
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 2/20 0.35
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.35
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.35
POLB P06746 2/20 0.35
GRN P28799 1/20 0.35
SORT1 Q99523 1/20 0.35
PTPRC P08575 2/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6434625 0.88 NPSR1 (0.48) TAS1R3TAS1R1MAPTTDP1GAA
SCHEMBL6433809 0.88 GRN (0.46) ROCK2TAS1R3TAS1R1MAPTTDP1
SCHEMBL6433807 0.88 GRN (0.46) ROCK2TAS1R3TAS1R1MAPTTDP1
SCHEMBL6434626 0.88 NPSR1 (0.48) TAS1R3TAS1R1MAPTTDP1GAA
SCHEMBL6436986 0.86 ROCK2 (0.34) ROCK2TAS1R3TAS1R1MAPTTDP1
SCHEMBL6435278 0.85 ROCK2 (0.53) ROCK2MAPTTDP1NPSR1KDM4E
SCHEMBL6435282 0.85 ROCK2 (0.53) ROCK2MAPTTDP1NPSR1KDM4E
SCHEMBL6437307 0.84 MAPT (0.43) MAPTTDP1CA1CA2NPSR1
SCHEMBL6433264 0.83 ROCK2 (0.44) ROCK2TAS1R3TAS1R1GAAKDM4E
SCHEMBL6435824 0.82 TAS1R3 (0.43) TAS1R3TAS1R1CA1CA2NPSR1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 ROCK2 2546/4885TAS1R3 3747/4885TAS1R1 3148/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 ROCK2 2546/4885TAS1R3 3747/4885TAS1R1 3148/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.