SCHEMBL6433264

SCHEMBL6433264

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)CC(NC(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c2c1)c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ROCK2 O75116 11/20 0.44
ROCK1 Q13464 7/20 0.44
PPARG P37231 4/20 0.40
TACR3 P29371 1/20 0.39
S1PR4 O95977 1/20 0.39
S1PR3 Q99500 1/20 0.39
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.39
GAA P10253 1/20 0.39
CTSA P10619 1/20 0.39
TAS1R3 Q7RTX0 1/20 0.38
TAS1R1 Q7RTX1 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6433233 0.87 ROCK2 (0.41) ROCK2ROCK1PPARGTACR3
SCHEMBL7394132 0.86 ROCK2 (0.49) ROCK2ROCK1PPARGKDM4EGAA
SCHEMBL6437559 0.83 ROCK2 (0.38) ROCK2KDM4EGAATAS1R3TAS1R1
SCHEMBL6435278 0.81 ROCK2 (0.53) ROCK2KDM4E
SCHEMBL6435282 0.81 ROCK2 (0.53) ROCK2KDM4E
SCHEMBL6434389 0.80 PTPRC (0.49) KDM4EGAA
SCHEMBL6437307 0.78 MAPT (0.43) KDM4E
SCHEMBL6436909 0.77 DGAT2 (0.50)
SCHEMBL6435819 0.76 TAS1R3 (0.43) TAS1R3TAS1R1
SCHEMBL6435824 0.76 TAS1R3 (0.43) TAS1R3TAS1R1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 ROCK2 2546/4885ROCK1 1845/4885PPARG 1104/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 ROCK2 2546/4885ROCK1 1845/4885PPARG 1104/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.